Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 583818350833041419


2019-05-31 00:37:02 UTC  

16+21

2019-05-31 00:37:52 UTC  

If he is in reasonable age yes. having 24-60 preying on kids is disgusting

2019-05-31 00:38:23 UTC  

I can accept 24-28 if it's agreed by both families

2019-05-31 00:38:40 UTC  

How is 60 predatory but 25 isn't?

2019-05-31 00:38:49 UTC  

Or 20

2019-05-31 00:39:38 UTC  

How is 60 predatory? well He is eligible to be her father

2019-05-31 00:40:13 UTC  

20s in our standards and how our system is structured is still a kid

2019-05-31 00:41:07 UTC  

You think a 20 year old won't prey on 16 year olds?

2019-05-31 00:41:12 UTC  

They do

2019-05-31 00:41:13 UTC  

Or 18 and 16?

2019-05-31 00:41:24 UTC  

18-16 is logical

2019-05-31 00:41:33 UTC  

not a big difference in age gab

2019-05-31 00:41:40 UTC  

and they still are in the same school.

2019-05-31 00:41:51 UTC  

Just the 18 is finishing that year.

2019-05-31 00:42:28 UTC  

18 will prey on 16 just like 60

2019-05-31 00:42:32 UTC  

No difference

2019-05-31 00:43:31 UTC  

They will, in my mind seems logical though but it doesn't sit right nor I would accept for a grown up fag to hunt down girls

2019-05-31 00:43:52 UTC  

A 14 year old here offed herself cause the parents closed in prison her molester

2019-05-31 00:44:56 UTC  

But you accept a 17 year old to do it?

2019-05-31 00:45:41 UTC  

Depends, if I do KNOW him I could accept it if he wasn't a fag

2019-05-31 00:45:41 UTC  

I have sisters that age. 14 year olds who have sex are not victims.

2019-05-31 00:46:48 UTC  

They are victims though, their brain isn't even capable to understand most things. 14 year olds are still in middle school here

2019-05-31 00:46:57 UTC  

not even high school

2019-05-31 00:47:52 UTC  

14 is straight up pedophillia

2019-05-31 00:47:55 UTC  

If you're gonna use brain development as a standard, that's 21+

2019-05-31 00:48:24 UTC  

Once they have hit puberty there is no pedophilia. Pedophilia is before puberty

2019-05-31 00:48:54 UTC  

Should we begin hunt women when they have their first blood then?

2019-05-31 00:49:21 UTC  

because when they have the first blood it means they are ready for reproduction

2019-05-31 00:49:40 UTC  

What makes her a victim? Her own lack of development? If so then a 16 year old and a 60 year old could victimize her equally.

2019-05-31 00:50:11 UTC  

Doesn't it? You find logical this gap?

2019-05-31 00:50:26 UTC  

I'm not even supporting sex before 18

2019-05-31 00:50:29 UTC  

By setting these arbitrary numbers, it's saying that once a person reaches an age, it's acceptable to have sex

2019-05-31 00:51:18 UTC  

Well I have been raised to have some values in what is acceptable and what not, so I'm certainly biased in my thinking

2019-05-31 00:51:24 UTC  

but thats what is hitting right with me

2019-05-31 00:51:35 UTC  

The value and the standard should be if they are married or not

2019-05-31 00:52:02 UTC  

And to this I agree.

2019-05-31 00:52:47 UTC  

But it's also a meaning that my daughter will be off-limits for this kind of fuck-tards May guns be "banned" but I still can get my hands on them a lot easy

2019-05-31 00:52:57 UTC  

Having sex with an 18 year old girl without marriage is more wrong than marrying a 17 year old

2019-05-31 00:53:06 UTC  

no

2019-05-31 00:53:10 UTC  

Yes

2019-05-31 00:53:29 UTC  

yes* I meant