Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 583817539625418762
16 is age of consent in most of the US
That's really the age women should be married
17 for women, 21 for men. 17 year old men should be drafted and sent to fight wars in foreign countries that we can't pronounce the names of.
After four nonstop years of war, they'll be hardened warriors and return home to marry and reproduce with the next generation of 17 year old girls
16 is an age of consent ? Probably. Should they be married off to scum of 55+? Dunno
Personally if anyone from any age came near to my daughter he would be skinless
16+21
If he is in reasonable age yes. having 24-60 preying on kids is disgusting
I can accept 24-28 if it's agreed by both families
How is 60 predatory but 25 isn't?
Or 20
How is 60 predatory? well He is eligible to be her father
20s in our standards and how our system is structured is still a kid
You think a 20 year old won't prey on 16 year olds?
They do
Or 18 and 16?
18-16 is logical
not a big difference in age gab
and they still are in the same school.
Just the 18 is finishing that year.
No difference
They will, in my mind seems logical though but it doesn't sit right nor I would accept for a grown up fag to hunt down girls
A 14 year old here offed herself cause the parents closed in prison her molester
But you accept a 17 year old to do it?
Depends, if I do KNOW him I could accept it if he wasn't a fag
I have sisters that age. 14 year olds who have sex are not victims.
They are victims though, their brain isn't even capable to understand most things. 14 year olds are still in middle school here
not even high school
14 is straight up pedophillia
If you're gonna use brain development as a standard, that's 21+
Once they have hit puberty there is no pedophilia. Pedophilia is before puberty
Should we begin hunt women when they have their first blood then?
because when they have the first blood it means they are ready for reproduction
What makes her a victim? Her own lack of development? If so then a 16 year old and a 60 year old could victimize her equally.
Doesn't it? You find logical this gap?
I'm not even supporting sex before 18
By setting these arbitrary numbers, it's saying that once a person reaches an age, it's acceptable to have sex
Well I have been raised to have some values in what is acceptable and what not, so I'm certainly biased in my thinking
but thats what is hitting right with me
The value and the standard should be if they are married or not