Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 519625396916977679
look, i drink beer, and you and i both know neither of us are Da Vinchers or Telsas
quit prit co
You drink beer? #triggered #cancelKavanaugh
It's my choice of try-cyclic antidepressant
how does e.g CNN even still exist???? https://youtu.be/jTWY14eyMFg
_"Charles Jaco was the CNN reporter famous for covering the 1990 Persian Gulf War.
The first part of this video shows the stage set he was on, and he was clowning around with fellow CNN staff. The Saudi Arabian "hotel" in the background were fake palm trees and a blue wall in a studio. This clip was leaked by CNN staff."_
and what's that clip of the two milfs standing in the same parkinglot pretending to do distance reporting?
Or any time there's a major event and their story changes a billion times
Like that shooter a few years back
Where all they did was spout random shit someone on staff probably came up with
aye, e.g "Multiple Shooters" is a nice goto if only one shooter have been confirmed killed and there _might_ just _might_ be a second on
To be fair multiple potential shooters always get reported because you get conflicting witness reports
witness say "bullets flying at us from everywhere"... BOOM... MULTIPLE SHOOTERS!
Or witnesses directly saying there were 2 shooters
Example: Las Vegas Shooting Dispatch Logs https://archive.org/details/Las_Vegas_shooting_dispatch_logs_0012pdf
https://i.imgur.com/qURq936.png ... 2 mentions of the word _"multiple"_
"Multiple Shots" (on page 9) , and "Multiple Tows" (on page 135)
so there sure as hell weren't anyone calling in "2 shooters!"
No but there is footage of people running away from the location of a nonexistent shooter
Parkland had one of the students claim she was with the shooter when shots were fired, which caused people to erroneously believe there were two
Weird shit like that
Needs to be vetted obviously, and news orgs jump the gun
isn't it illegal to provide false alibi in the US?
(even when not under any kind of oath, i mean) ... "Yeah, i saw him, he was standing right next to me"... She could of course claim being a total moron or poor of eyesight
I can't remember the details of it, but no it isn't illegal to BS the media AFAIK
not even when it impacts ongoing police investigation?
Did it impact the investigation?
i kind of assumed it, since you said a witness claimed it; The police had already concluded on one shooter? _"Parkland had one of the students claim she was with the shooter when shots were fired, which caused people to erroneously believe there were two"_
Well with Parkland they caught the shooter the same day iirc
Most school shootings the shooter commits suicide at the end anyway (whether by cop or their own firearm) so it's pretty straightforward
And this controversy came about from from a student witness saying she was with the shooter, when shots got fired? _AFTER_ the fact?
was she not put on witness stand?!?!?
Well it wasn't much in the way of controversy. A blip on the radar really. It was just a claim that popped up
Pretty sure the shooter confessed but I'd have to go look again
A couple of the Vegas survivors also challenged the narrative. The issue is that witness testimony is shite
Same thing happens with most of the high profile police brutality/shooting cases. People claim shit that didn't happen, and they often claim it sincerely
forget about that.. HOW was a witness that claimed she was with an accused shooter, not put on witness stand??
That is impossible!
Probably because her testimony wasn't deemed relevant for either side's case
well that must mean she was either blind, psychotic, too mentally challenged, be considered as witness etc..
Ah there we go
Events were the other way around