@caykoh Just because someone is more studied doesnt make them right

Ultimately its whats said

I agree. So here's what really gives me friction...

If the entity issuing the message can be accurate, and thust trustworthy, regardless of its reputation or current standing, as long as the message in question maps onto the facts and data

Can the term fake news actually even exist in our vernacular?

As be im ng attributeed to the entity

Being *

If something contradicts itself or misleads it should considered less credible

Fake news story, or fake news article, I assume would be the good faith substitute

Ah glad you mention that. So...

If BBc contradicts itself today, and yes tsrday once too, does tomorrow's stories from them have less credibility already ?

Yeah

To some extent

Unless they clear it up and push an honest narrative

Instead of evade

Sk that's the messenger matterin g more than the message

No but the message caused the dent

Ultimately people want something credible but what they say is not automatically wrong

So I guess its what matters the exposure or the message

As a good reputation leads to exposure and the message is whats shown

But if two days in a row, BBC fucked up their,let's say reporting on soccer hooligans rioting, falsely claiming one side was more violent than the other. Should I be skepticle of BBC reliability and reporting the accuracy of the soccer match scores?

No because those are not related

Well you should be skeptical of anything shown to you

Just bbc even more so after that happened

You can’t spin an observable fact such as weather or match results

But just about anything else can be spun

Also do your own research

So i trust bbc weather reports but not their political analysis

I agree Largezo112, but would make a point that you can its just difficult, allege referee corruption incomtence

You can measure anger by stats or the metaphysical state

And you can spin the message to an audiences preferbce

^

You can Trust BBC???

ain't they the least trusted media thingy in the world??

Cutting clips or leaving out stats etc.

@Stefan Payne Its an example

On what content, stefan?

However if facts become politicized we are in trouble “you cannot argue against the global warming which is a fact “ would be a fallacy

I only know the piece of Paper of that Monty Python Guy that showed that 23% of Brits trust their Media

@Stefan Payne read my messages properly before jumping the gun

I like Jumping guns *muhahaha* 😄