Message from @caykoh

Discord ID: 519827529133981696


2018-12-05 10:41:30 UTC  

No but the message caused the dent

2018-12-05 10:42:33 UTC  

Ultimately people want something credible but what they say is not automatically wrong

2018-12-05 10:44:06 UTC  

So I guess its what matters the exposure or the message

2018-12-05 10:44:51 UTC  

As a good reputation leads to exposure and the message is whats shown

2018-12-05 10:45:39 UTC  

But if two days in a row, BBC fucked up their,let's say reporting on soccer hooligans rioting, falsely claiming one side was more violent than the other. Should I be skepticle of BBC reliability and reporting the accuracy of the soccer match scores?

2018-12-05 10:46:00 UTC  

No because those are not related

2018-12-05 10:46:11 UTC  

Well you should be skeptical of anything shown to you

2018-12-05 10:46:24 UTC  

Just bbc even more so after that happened

2018-12-05 10:46:35 UTC  

You canโ€™t spin an observable fact such as weather or match results

2018-12-05 10:46:51 UTC  

But just about anything else can be spun

2018-12-05 10:47:16 UTC  

Also do your own research

2018-12-05 10:47:18 UTC  

So i trust bbc weather reports but not their political analysis

2018-12-05 10:47:29 UTC  

I agree Largezo112, but would make a point that you can its just difficult, allege referee corruption incomtence

2018-12-05 10:48:16 UTC  

You can measure anger by stats or the metaphysical state

2018-12-05 10:48:17 UTC  

And you can spin the message to an audiences preferbce

2018-12-05 10:48:23 UTC  

^

2018-12-05 10:48:24 UTC  

You can Trust BBC???

2018-12-05 10:48:34 UTC  

ain't they the least trusted media thingy in the world??

2018-12-05 10:48:40 UTC  

Cutting clips or leaving out stats etc.

2018-12-05 10:48:51 UTC  

@Stefan Payne Its an example

2018-12-05 10:49:00 UTC  

On what content, stefan?

2018-12-05 10:49:10 UTC  

However if facts become politicized we are in trouble โ€œyou cannot argue against the global warming which is a fact โ€œ would be a fallacy

2018-12-05 10:49:27 UTC  

I only know the piece of Paper of that Monty Python Guy that showed that 23% of Brits trust their Media

2018-12-05 10:49:34 UTC  

@Stefan Payne read my messages properly before jumping the gun

2018-12-05 10:49:54 UTC  

I like Jumping guns *muhahaha* ๐Ÿ˜„

2018-12-05 10:50:12 UTC  

Just admit to your mistakes smh

2018-12-05 10:51:02 UTC  

This is my thesis on this topic...

2018-12-05 10:51:02 UTC  

that would make me an alt-right Nazi, can't have that, can we? ๐Ÿ˜‰

2018-12-05 10:53:55 UTC  

The message is the only thing that matters. All messengers give messages, and all of them will never achieve 100% message accuracy.Thus, as a messenger continues delivering messages, their net accuracy will still and always be in flux

2018-12-05 10:55:06 UTC  

Well, it depends if the Messenger tries to deliver the Message or change it because they like it more in a different way.

2018-12-05 10:55:59 UTC  

@caykoh Well if you already had an opinion now you can write your essay

2018-12-05 10:56:35 UTC  

If BBC lied to me about soccer hooligans, repeatedly, but tell me the rectar scale of an earthquake that just rocked me, as does my dad who a geloigst, and their the same, the BBC message on the earthquake can be trusted

2018-12-05 10:56:49 UTC  

^

2018-12-05 10:57:17 UTC  

After evaluation of course

2018-12-05 10:58:37 UTC  

I hope to compose my paper with greater Mount of data than my conclusive opinion on the topic

2018-12-05 10:59:18 UTC  

Well start with that

2018-12-05 10:59:34 UTC  

How does these two relate and which one is most important and why

2018-12-05 11:00:19 UTC  

Exactly

2018-12-05 11:00:27 UTC  

One last query

2018-12-05 11:03:02 UTC  

Given accuracy is the valuable factor from news , how should a person create their habits of media consumption to ensure they arrive at accurate reporting?

2018-12-05 11:04:11 UTC  

@caykoh They should refer back to sources and even multiple organization to find consistency between reports