hmm

Dems favour illegals because they can flood in.

^

Trump has been arguing for very low legal levels

Labour over here is doing the same shit here with this "refugee crisis".

I am for the wall but also for large legal quotas

The thing is, one party is for the other but not both

At least Michigan legalized weed

I'm with you on there, but if I'm going to only vote for one, I'm going with more secure borders

no sense in having large quotas if there is a crisis going on

They didn't learn from CO....but, well, I guess I"m glad I'm out

They should have a mechanism where illegal votes can be cancelled retrospectively.

They are?

Are they?

Apparently 1 texas flip in for dems

There has to actually be proof of illegal voting

you can see where this all comes in

And if enough are cancelled, the votes should be recalculated for that period and the seats managed accordingly.

Mitt is back

My impression is that they already were

Wait, what?

Mitt Romney's back?

Senator Utah

Won 55% of the vote

huh

Shit, wasn't even close

So Texas turning bluer, Cali turning more red.

Newsom just took lead in CA, 5% reporting

Where did yoou get that number?

Google

Hmmm, sounds to me like the people fleeing Cali are bringing their ideology to Texas.

He's all over the place...started in MI, then went to MA...then went somewhere else and ran for pres...now in UT???

now 60% percent

at 52% votes coming in

ya

He's Mormon

And I'm Catholic

He's got a connection to UT

My condolences.

Why

Aaaaa