Senate is the bigger prize

The Senate is based on absolute value, while the House is based on population numbers and distribution

Like SCOTUS?

Yes

So basically, this looks bad for Trump in 2020?

No

Like scotus

So does that mean we can appoint more people to SCOTUS?

Because Trump now has another arrow in his quiver

Yes

Yes, the Senate control is pretty much at least one more conservative Supreme Court Justice when Ginsberg's necromantic ritual energy runs out.

And watch all the fake rape accusations come rolling in?

Only if an opening

The thing is, the Democrats winning might have the opposite effect

No Obama was reelected with 1/1

How so Red?

@RedOblivion explain

Also, is this big enough to be a blue wave?

No

A blue drop

Because Trump can point at them and go "hey look at these assholes obstructing me and making us go into an economic downturn after they got in, sad!"

Kinda like Obama

Ohhhhh

Yup

yeah

Keep in mind that if the house goes Dem then it is highly likely the popular vote for 2018 is Dem. The way the Senate is set up means it'll go red, but more voters are blue.

So, more partisan drama

Ohh crap I didnt think of that

@DrYuriMom As of now

Alright, so Gillum, O'rourke and McCaskill all got destroyed. Thank you, Project Veritas.

That's the important thing

Book, they all dems?

More voters we're blue in 2016 too

True, but Trump has surprised a lot of people

And every election except 2004 going back to 1996.

his support has increased

1 lead

Incumbent party loses midterms

sorry to steal your thunder cat

What Im concerned about's all the 19 year olds who don't know crap about how insidious the Dems are by going so far left

More voters are blue but the mechanics giving small states a boost keeps Republicans up