It was like a civil war, the country was poor, in debt, and soviet russia occupied the most eastern island group in the baltic sea until 1950

Then boom NATO. A big FU to stalin about staying out.

In short. Imagine what would happen in Iraq or Afghanistan if the US pulled out overnight. Internal conflict

So much text

My brain just exploded

_sweeps up brain parts_

Sorry

Man, looking closer at the results from the midterms.. Fuck the libertarian party. Don't they know they're going to fail during a time when failure isn't an option? Why not just fucking be republican until there is overwhelming control and there can be concessions made?

Dems won like 4 senate seats because of libertarian party votes.

funny, you sound like the dems in 2016

he said libertarians should become part of the rep party

dems just said vote dem because orange man bad, so it's a bit better ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

don't blame the libertarians. they're just voting their conscience as is their right. blame the democrats for """finding""" tens of thousands of ballots days after the election was over.

i really have no clue how this is going to play out. florida is especially fucked up, with some parts of the government refusing the follow the law or the orders of other parts of the government.

we're going to get into a situation where both candidates declare themselves elected and there's no way to conclusive prove the other wrong.

the least awful solution would be to declare votes from the counties that have violated state election law as invalid, and arrest their election officials.

I had similar thoughts, though less vitriolic.

It's a little frustrating, but I'm not going to begrudge the Libertarians for voting for the candidate they actually want instead of voting for a compromise candidate.

No hes literally saying the same thing

"Why are you voting for a third party? We cant afford to fail so vote for my party, its the less evil/better choice

"Just be a party member until you have majority control and then im sure theyll work with you"

And I get the pragmatism of that approach.

A third party will never be established if its members refuse to vote for their guy during the election

But a third party is never going to get off the ground until they can mobilize enough support, and the best way of doing that is, well, supporting their candidates and getting the awareness out.

Yeah.

Their party will never happen if they align themselves wholeheartedly with an already existing political party no matter how much influence they get. Whatever support and influence they are able to wield will not be as an influence group within a party rather than as a distinct political party.

Saying that once the third party has majority control the main group will work with you is worthless because at that point the influence of the other parties means nothing.

It's less a matter of pragmatically getting some concessions and more a matter of political sovereignty.

If any political group is going to stand on principle, it's the libertarians.

```North of germany, south of norway :wink:```
So you#re one of those people coming over to Germany go buy booze @4AM_critter 🐉 ? 😉

Objectivism yay or nay?

no

because you must not objectify Womxn

shut up faggot

fag up shuggot

what a nice entry into a Discord Server...

lol

I am not sure if you are being sarcastic or not

😐

Nuances in your voice are not really transmitted well in written form. Tone is difficult to read.

But can you objectify men? <:PepoThink:477498566495961099>

Men have rights in this forsaken world`??