Message from @Ikea-Chan
Discord ID: 527304659074023426
They suffered breakdowns
Hard to repair
hand made
But when one worked
It really made the enemy shake.
meh, panthers were good adesign gvie you that
rest, evolutionary dead ends
like a lot of their allied counterparts to be fair
tigers, waste of resources
If I was a Soviet tanker in 1944/45 and I saw a Tiger II for the first time, I'd get out of my tank and run.
depends, if the tiger was looking eslewhere and you werent making a frontal assault , that tiger is dead
still say the centurion was the best tank design of WW2 😄
How many Centurions were used to **any** effectivity in WW2?
tiger and tiger II design philosophy died a decade after WW2
doesnt matter dammit
they were deployed before the end of WW2
by a few months
thats all that counts ¬.¬
best fucking design from WW2, EVAH
Maybe the best **design**.
sherman was likely the best mass produced tank of WW2
In many regards, yes
and before you complain about it being petrol, british shermans were diesals
I don't care what fuel it ran on
and, most strikes that set a petrol sherman alight would have destroyed a diesal sherman too
As long as it ran.
it was a design that was quick to produce, was manoeuvrable (more so than tigers) , had a good enough gun (despite US fuck ups in deploying the 76s too late to theatre based on the experience of their african campaigns) and easy to maintain
easily the best non british allied tank out there
>Non british allied tank
British tanks were too little too late.
The Cromwell was put into use in 44
yup
you might have guessed though, I'm British ;P
The British tank divisions mostly relied on American tanks that were shipped over
Some with minor improvements
pfft
improved shermans
I'm talking about the M3 Lee and M3 Grant
*chokes on his limoncello*
I was talking about the M4 sherman