so move to richer countries right?

nope doesnt really work like that as rich countries attract poor people

18.763.420 $ des Ziels von 1.000.000.000 $

reminder

@DefinitlyNotInsane - NL thats not the point. if poor people commit crime, then you are still potentially living in a country with a lot of criminals if you ignore them based on race.

@Grenade123 ähm, well. There are statistics about that...
And, well, they are racist

you want to block poor places, fine. what happens when poor people from eastern europe start invading

well as far as i know is that most eastern europeans dont complain about low wages and work from 7 to 23

and they have next to zero problems to integrate with western culture

well thats the rub isn't it.

and seeing as eastern europeans have been "invading" for a very long time now

so, when you get rid of all the black people, you going to go back to the irish too?

i think we can say that eastern european migration is almost a benefit as they do the jobs native western europeans dont want to do

and they dont even have any troubles with it

what, the irish? Yeah, no problems. Irish need not apply was a myth

who is talking about irish?

OMG; LOL; the Warren stuff is worse than I thought. She tried immitating Scott Adams...

@DefinitlyNotInsane - NL same logics and stats where used against the Irish when they immigrated to america

what logic?

you mean what i said

some flow: here is an ethnicity, the stats show they cause crime and problems, therefore we prosecute the ethnicity.

rather than identify the problem attributes, and get rid of everyone causing problems.

when did i say we have to get rid of all of them

can you maybe explain yourself a bit better as i think we are on different wavelenghts here

perhaps we are, what is the point of "black people and mexicans are more likely to commit crime (which is prove)" comment in relation to "i then say i dont like living in a country with alot of criminals"

it is about being able to say the truth and not have any llabels be put on you

i want to have the ability to say which race commits the most crime and not be painted a racist

and apart from that i dont want to live in a country with alot of crime

then why lead with the comment?

why not

because, in human interaction, it links the two. Leading implies causation. which makes it intentional. Stating a fact doesn't make it the truth.

you can state a bunch of facts to create a lie

that is true but which facts did i combine to create a lie

tell me, what purpose is there to put these 2 comments next to each-other?

absolutely nothing else but to save me from pressing enter twice

except people don't usually say things for no reason

well i didnt say anything for no reason did i?

i posted two sentences together as a means to save milliseconds that doesnt mean that i didnt have a reason for posting it right

you don't want to be called a racist for putting those 2 together, yet i assume you must say those 2 things together a lot for this to be a problem. If you post a concern together with a random fact but don't elaborate, most humans try to fit them together. Our brains are pattern recognition engines. The most common pattern for such a combination is cause and effect. So what reason do you have for stating those 2 together without any other context for this to be so often a problem?

implication is usually the term related to this problem

it is also the reason legal talk is so ridiculous as to no longer be logical to most people.