Message from @halfthink
Discord ID: 541996978071142430
Shouldn't gun rights be number 1 if were gonna have a war
No warfare likely wouldnt reach either side's shores in a way that light infantry weapons would be useful
Gun rights would be the top right if i thought a civil war was coming
but i doubt thats the case
Healthcare and gun rights are probably the two that affect me in my everyday life the most
The only valid human rights are property rights. Anything else not implied by that are privileges, not rights.
im curious to what that would and wouldn't include
in your opinion
Most importantly, it would include self ownership.
The ideal world is one in which businesses treat labor like family. That would be my priority
Free speech would somewhat be included, but if taken as absolute, it would violate property rights. You can't yell "fire!" in a crowded theatre, because the owner of the theatre would not approve and has the right to remove anyone from his property that violates the rules he sets as a condition of entry. Most would consider anyone who complained that this violates their right to free speech is being unreasonable.
Normally you dont pay family for work
Normally no
That should be the cultural mindset
Families provide for eachother
Next goal would be to minimize death. The most religious countries in the world are religious because they have people who die a lot. Suicide, homocide, health or whatever constitutes death should be minimized in order to have a fact based society rather than a faith based one.
Also make abortion more accessible and common on the grounds of reducing overpopulation.
The welfare state benefits the state, not the welfare recipients. If you hate Jews, give them money.
https://youtu.be/Pb9DNyTOh6U
@halfthink no you can't falsely yell fire in a theater because it puts the general public at risk. Not because of the owner.
Here is the scouts ruling that is relevant
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. ... The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree.
@halfthink Tim Pool is not alt right. Stop trying to shit alt rightism all over his server. You guys have plenty of your own servers.
What the fuck, that's a crazy thought. Tim's not alt right
no, no, Tim is "Alt-Right," he isn't in lock step with the CTRL-Left so anyone who isn't in lock step is an "Alt-Right" boogey man. Tim admitted it on the video this morning
FUCKING SOOT
IT'S FUCKING SOOT
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE
Soot on the face of white working class people doesn't fit the "White People don't know what it is to be poor" BULL being pushed so the CRTL-LEFT propaganda speakers are now calling it black face
LOL the WaPo caring about Journaliism?
who was it that posted this racist black supremacist racist appalling worst article ever??
THat "Can my kids be friends with white people" shit.
was it the WaPo or NYT?
@Stefan Payne NYT
The journalist cries out as he tries to libel you and ruin your life.
@devpav It's in the Alinsky rules. Also, your name is familiar. Are you on my server or YT channel?
@Analytical Chick you can check their profile and see