```[Women] are “economic land,” because they are equivalent to physical land in being original, nature-given factors of production. Yet will anyone deny title to a cow to the man that finds and domesticates her, putting her to use? For this is precisely what occurs in the case of land. Previously valueless “wild” land, like wild animals, is taken and transformed by a man into goods useful for man. The “mixing” of labor gives equivalent title in one case as in the other.

-Murray N. Rothbard.```

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyS1j2EeSrc

Always funny how we go to the past for the reasons to move forward and ignore the present for reasons to do the same.

I think TP underestimates what's going on in the true alt-right. Richard Spencer's channel and discord server are only growing, and the Murdoch Murdoch crew is as popular as ever.

https://youtu.be/5PbMzuweaEc

Basic copyright seems necessary when it comes to art.
Personally, I would be willing to give up "art as we know it" for fully open source society, but I imagine professional artists being upset over this.
When it comes to science there is both big pros and cons.
But with recent Youtube policy of demonetizing videos for having seconds of other person's footage, which used to fall under "fair use", I think pretty much everyone (except big corporations) is in favor of reducing copyrights.

I don't think art will die if copyright did.

and plop https://pastebin.com/nHD257Af

"art as we know it"

Whether it's painting something on canvas, mural or Sistine chappel, copyright doesn't even come to it.

"art" as we know it

And lots of digital arts is released on other funding models to begin with such as Patreon.

Commissions.

preemptive response

https://pastebin.com/WEXBpiKb

Comissions for what? You can just take someone else's photo and edit it a bit and there you go. Why pay comissions

Considering it's illegal to take photographs outside, with a known building on the background, behind your friend, I think pressure to destroying copyright is already past the point of salvaging copyright.

Which country are we talking about?

And the CP promoters are just pushing more and more dystopian levels of protection, more dystopian levels of monitoring, and more dystopian jurisdictions for both police and private investigators. And extortion letters, etc.

In the USA at least you can't actually be prevented from taking pictures on public property last time I checked

@Yuukimaru Some countries in Europe has copyright extended to architecture. And the consider the copyright to belong to the architect, not the photographer.

Ok. I still think reducing copyright is more politically viable than abolishing it completely

Same could be said about fixing the EU.

Yet both the copyright holders and EU resist being regulated or fixed. Of course they do. The critique is coming from outside.

To check whether you have the right to take pictures of buildings and art placed in public areas, check: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama

EU copyright is a joke at this point, it's barely legal to even post links

Both EU and copyright are jokes separately. You don't even need to combined them to make a joke.

https://youtu.be/fdBtsJnfAEo

An hour long commentary? What makes it worth listening to?

HOLY SHITE! is he really alive?

David Duke responds to the SotU?

Why should I care what a KKK Grand Wizard thinks?

The Dems need him to endore Trump to prove Trump is racist KKK Facist Bigoted NEONAZI.... ect ect

,,, but I thought he backed Democrats and shit

MSM runs his endorcement of the GOP President Hopeful every year to get people to vote Dem

XD

that's cute

If you'd change your vote to Democrat because some crazy idiot out there likes the Republican candidate...
You were already voting Democrat.

Was illhan Omar right? How is the Israel related stuff the only thing most US politicians can agree on?

And was it really antiemetic?

Why is slowmode enabled?

```Why should I care what a KKK Grand Wizard thinks?```
Because all people have the right to tell their opinion. Just because he was in the KKK doesn't make him a bad person.
I'd say he might be a Pacifist and totally against violence