Message from @halfthink
Discord ID: 545483699664322590
what
@Aero Usually, it's those on the right who trust absolutely no one.
There's just been a systematic brainwashing of society to put trust in the state
@Existence is identity In reference to the average Normie, is he wrong?
There's no value judgement attached to that statement
kek
I take it you're another butthurt IBS nerd with an animus for Sargon?
I really don't get the Sargon hate. Anything he says is either shitposting, or really mundane Centrist stuff that everyone should be in agreement with in the first place.
No, I dont mind sargon most of the time
Except I forgot what it was id have to dig it up but he said something really dumb
He even has read Locke
lol
The only thing I can really remember right now is how he calls himself an individualist then proceeds to want government intervention
The social contract argument is fucking stupid as shit
Holocaust wasn't murder, it was suicide, because social contract.
lol\
@Fitzydog I already watched the video when it was posted. Top comment on it was mine.
@halfthink What video?
@halfthink ur a nigger
Ur mom's a nigger.
YOU TAKE THAT BACK
Doesnt jd ban people for racial slurs?
@Existence is identity lol wut? no
Who is jd?
jdm
The board owner
Who?
@ JDM_WAAAT#6969
I've said nigger in this server plenty of times.
I'm in another board of his, and I've never been banned
Negar
lol
Going back the the social contract and lack of consent video "Taxation Isn't Theft, Because of the Social Contract", do we ask murderers for consent to jail them? Call it a strawman or whatever, but in this frame of mind, let's make a hypothetical situation with some assumptions:
Assumptions:
A government's bare minimum objective is to govern over the people who consented to be governed and defend those people. This requires a police force and a military. Secondary objective in this day in age would probably be to deal with foreign governments as representatives of those people it governs.
Because of this assumption, the government in effect lays claim to the land which it presides over - not in terms of ownership, but in terms of protection from both internal (via Police) and external (via Army) forces. The details of this sort of non-ownership claim would have to be ironed out a bit more, sure, but in effect it means eminent domain can't really be applied.