Message from @whiic

Discord ID: 547880835831824414


2019-02-20 18:36:37 UTC  

I don't think anyone believes he's a perfect president

2019-02-20 18:37:06 UTC  

As Tucker Carlson put it, "Happy countries don't elect Donald Trump. Desperate ones do."

2019-02-20 18:37:21 UTC  

nobody voted him in because *he was the best man for the job*

2019-02-20 18:40:07 UTC  

The lesser of two evils

2019-02-20 18:40:25 UTC  

I mean some people vote in president expecting to fufill every promise and thats not always realistic. You should at least like candidate. Id like it if people voted for trump, ill make the argument why you should.

2019-02-20 18:41:43 UTC  

Iono its weird cause its like i want to tell left centrist dont vote for the left jist because your left, but in that scenario democrats would lose power

2019-02-20 18:41:55 UTC  

The flipside scenario is also true

2019-02-20 18:46:58 UTC  

Its just terrible to pick between the lesser of 2 evils

2019-02-20 19:10:02 UTC  

Join the KKK brothers

2019-02-20 19:17:25 UTC  

Nah. Theyd lynch 2 many ppl

2019-02-20 19:17:43 UTC  

Fuck that hoodrat shit

2019-02-20 19:17:52 UTC  

Lol

2019-02-20 20:04:23 UTC  

I'm watching the retarded video defending Anita, since youtube keeps shoving it down my throat

2019-02-20 20:04:39 UTC  
2019-02-20 20:05:47 UTC  

why does every male feminist look like this

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/509549100061163520/547871512527372358/bigjoel.PNG

2019-02-20 20:41:37 UTC  

Copypasting what I commented about that video in particular on Sargon's server:

....and the Internet calls out Sargon on being fixated on Sarkeesian (even though he hasn't talked about her in a long time aside from refuting the claim that he does).

It's funny how he thinks that he comes of as a reasonable person in the middle and that he has to convince that he's on the left. Dude, outside of the left, no-one thought you were on the center.
"Threats and harassment!" Yeah, Sargon, Thunderf00t, TJ Kirk totally harassed and threatened Sarkeesian. It's not like Sarkeesian is just playing the cry bully and demanding actual penalties to people who disagree with her (stated, not necessary genuine) opinions.

2019-02-20 20:41:54 UTC  

I like how Joel's argues against any TF's critique against Sarkeesian by "this critique would be valid if the games were supposed to represent reality but they don't" (while ignoring that fact for every feminist critique Sarkeesian levels at the same games. Joel's key method of arguing is hypocrisy and turning things upside down. Like when he reviewed Red Pill recently (when it's way past being a hot topic, much like Sarkeesian is by this point) it all went through a weird feminist filter which managed to turn male draft into female oppression (via "women aren't assumed capable of combat").

2019-02-20 20:42:09 UTC  

Kevin Logan on the other hand relies on character assassination - and almost alone on that. And Kristi Winters relies on frame games, i.e setting the win conditions properly so burden of proof is externalized. Also gishgallop and demanding sources for even the most common sense assertions. The SJW come in so many forms ranging from blinded by ideology to virtue signal warriors (lobsters in a basket) to masterminds on the drawing table. It's interesting to categorize where each SJW fall into: conscript (for what they believe is good cause), mercenary (for personal benefit) or warlord (for their preferred social order). And how each of them intermingle despite having fundamentally different reasons and goals for doing what they do, much like there's nothing in common with actual trolls and real nazis... and how you can actually see SJWs alongside with real nazis to fight against the center (but only the mercenary types, as they don't actually believe what they profess).

2019-02-20 20:42:24 UTC  

Back to Joel, and his typically Jewy and slimy video. Basically any argument against Sarkeesian's critique is invalid because games are not real world. If a female NPC character shows dominance, it does not qualify as a strong woman because she was created to say or do that thing and is objectified. Just forget that there are also a thousand male NPCs to be killed, and that since it's not real world so even self-defense should be considered anti-male torture porn. Or but neither he nor Sarkeesian made that latter argument, and noticed that there's lot of anti-male torture porn out there.

And sad thing really is, that these people think they are being reasonable. And that the society is slipping to the right.
/rant

2019-02-20 20:42:50 UTC  

...and it just got worse with him saying that Luben Schluben (fictional pro-nazi) game can be called toxic even if it was so over-the-top that it would not convert anyone to nazism because it is morally objectionable, and that was what Sarkeesian was (supposedly) pointing out rather than being Jack Thompson v2.0 and calling toxic games for causing IRL toxicity.

Yet, Joel before said that pointing out that Princess Peach is a princess was supposedly invalid because we were supposed to acknowledge that it's just a game, not real world. So we weren't supposed to pay attention to woman = princess, man = blue-collar worker, that power imbalance. But when Luben Schluben, we cannot just assume it's a game, we need to see what it tells us about how in-game society is organized.

If he was consistent, he should at least be OK with pro-nazi game as long as the player character doesn't get to kill Jews. If nazis killed Jews in the background, and everything in the game was propaganda, that should be OK if it doesn't allow the player to enact a power fantasy in killing Jews. Because it's not real world, it's a game. But why be consistent.

How do these people manage all the doublethink? They can just slip from A to non-A and back again if needed.

2019-02-20 20:43:05 UTC  

**END OF COPYPASTA**

2019-02-20 20:44:11 UTC  

As you can determine from the above, that pro-feminist Sarkeesian licking pissed me off. I might have been primed for that reaction since I've earlier watched another of his videos, that is the review of The Red Pill documentary.

2019-02-20 20:53:51 UTC  

The stacey green one?

2019-02-20 20:55:00 UTC  

What?

2019-02-20 20:55:33 UTC  

The red pill review your talking about

2019-02-20 20:56:07 UTC  

Was the guy reviewing thebstacey green video? Could be sayin the name wrong

2019-02-20 20:56:15 UTC  

I was talking about Big Joel's videos. The one defending Sarkeesian, and the one dismissing men's issues presented in The Red Pill. Stacey Green is not the only one reviewing it.

2019-02-20 20:56:48 UTC  

Ima have to give them a look.

2019-02-20 20:57:02 UTC  

Big Joel just comes off as slimy.

2019-02-20 20:57:03 UTC  

But i dont think this is true leftism.

2019-02-20 20:57:35 UTC  

What would ever qualify as true leftism? Communism has never been tried, etc.

2019-02-20 20:58:01 UTC  

Nah not that. Its like fox news doesnt represent true right either.

2019-02-20 20:58:24 UTC  

Like majority of ppl are dumb

2019-02-20 20:58:57 UTC  

And just parrot ideas but then the source of where those ideas comes crom gets left alone

2019-02-20 21:00:40 UTC  

Who's Stacey Green by the way? Did you mean Laci Green?

2019-02-20 21:00:56 UTC  

Laci green yea. I remember the sargon drama

2019-02-20 21:01:34 UTC  

But yea as an idea gets parroted person 2 person, the meaning gets blurred and its poor representation

2019-02-20 21:02:48 UTC  

Laci Green appears as such an airhead I cannot know if she's actually just an idiot or truly evil mastermind.

2019-02-20 21:02:59 UTC  

Prolly both