in life

I don't agree, I don't think we need religion for meaning, or morality.

and have hope

BNW also has strict castes, Christianity would run in opposition to that

I would agree that we don't need religion for those things, but I think we've done a poor job of replacing it

Like....I don't want people to be religious

but there's no easier alternative

I don't hugely care if people are religious

I feel like there is, spatiality (for lack of a better word) doesn't need any of the trappings of religion.

That's one of my major problems with Jordan peterson.

Jordan Peterson accepts the existence of nonreligious cohesion

what is spatiality

Otherwise he'd hate Nietzsche

And it's pretty clear his second biggest boner topic after Jung is Nietzsche

I don't know about jbp man

he's like verbal hitchens

Yeah, but I feel that the whole concept of god is problematic in forwarding the research into conciseness.

Doubly clear if you read 12 Rules, where he directly quotes Jung and specifically Thus Spoke Zarathustra

I feel so dumb saying this

@Deleted User To be fair Hitchens is verbal hitchens too.

Well you also have to take into account how Peterson compartmentalizes God

But I don't understand most of the stuff he says

Which is as a sort of force

@Deleted User read Nietzsche and it will become pretty clear

Hitchens was atleast easier

Don't feel dumb, it's a lot of word salad.

Look into Freud and Jung just a tad and you'll be set

to understand

He actually summarizes them pretty well

Not to say he doesn't make good point, I'm just saying it's in a lot of word salad.

Word salad means there are no points

He's taking concepts that are explained in 200+ page books and bringing them down to hour long lectures

I think he's about as precise as he can be a lot of the time

i.e- All feminist literature

No.

I know what word salad is

Everyday Feminism is not word salad.

jbp definistely isn't word salad

It make extreamly clear points.

LITERATURE

LIT