Let me find the timecode

Not 100%. The end statement is the same, but the reasoning behind that statement is that there are systematic rules in place for to be the only inevitable outcome. Which is pure bullshit, but it's not 100% white supremacist

Ah okay, so it wasnt said in a vaccum.

That makes more sense.

I don't 100% remember the debate, but that's what anyone could probably infer from his stance

I've never heard of the guy personally

Same before the debate

I just remember that he made it a glorious laugh

Trapping himself with lines like that

The debate should be on Youtube

It's not very intellectual

Eh, im not terribly interested, especially if its one sided.

Or rather

Not very deep

For the most part

He ends up storming off

It was actually supposed to be an interview IIRC

But Thomas chose to turn it into a debate

@Ashers
https://youtu.be/mTFL0wKmsC0?t=1692

Thomas:"I'm in favour of making things more equal."
Sargon: "I'm in favour of making things more free."
Thomas:"Freedom allows white men to control everything!"

Oh yeah, that guy was not at all qualified to be there.

But then again he was one of the only ones willing to be there to defend their side

SO HE'S A WHITE SUPREMACIST

CONFIRMED

lmao

Sargon did something similar today/yesterday

I don't remember the full context but he was talking to a BBC chap and a feminist MP and the topic of womens rights and human rights came up

and Carl argued somethign to the degree of "name rights women have that men don't" and the reporter mentioned abortion. Sargon said "Don't you think men can have abortions?"

the bBC reporters said no, and Sargon replied with "then by her (feminist)'s opinion you're transphobic"

in regards to FtM people

lmfao

the reporter seemed a little confused and dazed

To be fair, the argument isn't that white men are *better* than other races/women, but that they got a head start and were able to rig things in their favor

Which is a fair assessment in western civilization ^

@Deleted User Yea, I'm not denying he said that line. All I'm saying is that their reasoning behind them coming ot the same conclusion as white supremacist is not the same.

I know, I know

I agree

I remember that video with the bbc reporter

There were a bunch of golden lines

"I'm a journalist, It's not my job to see if something's credible."

"Human rights are subjective though"