I could try making it but I don't know where to get objective info and I'm not very good at writing

So this would be curated and written by a couple writers?

Yeah

And people can suggest edits which the writers can review

Traditionally, encyclopedias were made by looking for underpaid university faculty and paying them to write the article.

But those guys won't be objective

Like, they'll describe communism "A movement for the liberation of workers"

The editors are (in theory) supposed to look for people who would be objective or well positioned to talk about things from a sufficiently sophisticated viewpoint.

You know what I would love

I would love to get a bunch of quora writers

Matthew Bates, John Cate

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2015/01/20/wikipedia-or-encyclopaedia-britannica-which-has-more-bias/#dbe43527d4ab

Habib Fanny, Jon Davis

They tend to be very objective

And represent both sides as honestly as possible

I'd say Ernest Adams but he's a cuck

The number of revisions required to start showing this effect, however, is quite large—at least 2,000 edits—and the articles most read by users aren't necessarily those most revised by editors. "To some extent, we are not seeing the scenario where too many cooks spoil the broth, we are mostly seeing an insufficient number of cooks," says Zhu.

If Wikipedia would like to improve its objectivity, Zhu recommends that it encourage editors to revise the most-read stories first, as well as encouraging people with different political leanings to edit the same article.

If you want, find anything that asks questions about trump

You will find people who will try to be objective

Maybe I should try it, huh

It'll look good on a resume!

And maybe ask for donations hehehe

Eh they will just someone who will do it for free

The benefit of Quora is that if theres a good answer, it will stay there.

What no

I mean donations from readers

Like wikipedia

Problem is, the people who are on those sites are people with nothing better do to

Make any change to any political article, and it will be reverted no matter how many sources you put on

Its most obvious on the MeToo and Gamergate wiki articles.

But this won't have metoo or stuff like thag

Itll be pure politics

Thats why I said Quora has that benefit

Certainly sounds interesting

Maybe even revolutions

You cant edit answers

You can

Other peoples answers

That's what I said man

@ExceptionalFeather Interesting. I've heard rumors though that Wikipedia created an editor hierarchy to control quality on the site (so we don't get long screeds on "arm cannons in Metroid")

I've then been told that the editors have been playing purge games with each other and then using their moderation powers to be picky and choosey with edits.

The readers can suggest edits