Message from @Blackhawk342
Discord ID: 474077943958601740
It's funny because only the very worst sort of people are against it. lol
Or at least, the MAIN reason
The feminists and the puritans?
They thinly veil their reason
Dude, I have a thing for robot chicks
"If men can get SEX then-- ERMM" They don't wanna say it.
But we know.
They probably will reject me anyway
So um...A guy asked me about materialism
I ended up writing 7 paragraphs with illustrations and then another 4 to explain the double slit experiment and how it is used to prove a contradiction to materialism
I think I might just be a little obsessed
You are obessed with internet discourse
Aight.
How peculiar
I'm just nice..
And obsessed you freak
Freak of discourse
yea
how dare you give a long and detailed explanation about a topic
How dare you be logical and reasonable
resonable discussion isnt welcomed unless it happens within an echo chamber
I mean
This whole thing was cause by one of the stupidest, most mind numbing arguments I've ever had
Why diddint you start with that?
Oh god....
There was a theist on the feminist server. He asked me if I was a materialist, and I said yes
You are that person that stays up because somebody on the internet had the audacity to be wrong
materialist vs spiritual?
Materialist vs idealist
I guess spirituals are idealists
So he's like DOUBLE SPLIT EXPERIMENT BTFO ATHEIST GET REKT
LIterally.
Sounds pleasant
now thats a good internet arguement
gotta hit em with that NO U
So I patiently explained that materialism was an ontology, and that the observer effect does not prove it wrong, it only shows that we have more to discover.
And it was another four hours of GET REKT ATHEIST
Jesus, an anoyying spiritualist
Probably worse than a annoying atheist
Then, this dude starts explaining the observer effect