checkmate

you're 0.05% authoritarian, you nazi

WTF DID YOU CALL ME REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

i think a certain type of tribalism is the whole point. the aim is to have a polycentric framework of law subject to free market competition, so you don't have a monopoly on law by a group of elites.

@Tohob keep that on the dee el people here might ostracize me

well, what keeps us there?

at one point, most of humanity was tribal

how did we get to here?

culture. politics and government or other organizations of society is downstream from culture.

we stopped killing people

can there be more than one culture along side the an-cap one

say an an-com one?

yup, but ancaps disagree. ancaps has split up into two camps, voluntaryists and hoppean ancaps.

hmm, haven't heard this difference

im a voluntaryist so i support the right for communists to build a commune as long as its voluntary participation.

What if the communes want to fight eachother?

but i dont think hoppean ancaps would support it, since they think it would destroy the culture needed to have a free society, i think. i may be getting it wrong.

i think they might be on to something in that respect because i don't see an-cap surviving long unless its world wide nearly overnight

well if they are fighting they are initiating aggression. the rest of us could just not get involved, or we could help with the defense of one side if they request it, i suppose.

so, what happens when one culture decides to invade another by force?

you mean like ..... MUSLIMS

lmao

more like any asshat who gets greedy

there are always plenty of those

just look at sweeden , UK and canada

that's wtf happens

what are they specifically invading?

culture

i think the crusades i think fit better

well they aren't doing it forcefully

in an ancap society there would only be private property basically, we wouldnt have any collectivist system or land to defend

@NativeInterface whatever reason. there is usually reason but sometimes is resources, other times its personal feuds, sometimes its just because they can.

how can you have private property but no land to defend?

you have at least 1 plot of land

unless you property doesn't count land

i mean you wouldnt be pushing people away from some nation border

under sharia law women is property right ?

i have the skeleton of an argument that a homestead can be nation, but that is for a different time, and not fleshed out at the moment

but you have something to defend

i.e your property