https://i.redd.it/paid334yn2a11.jpg

First sentence is a strawman, seems like FE's sometimes dont even want to debate

I was on 24/7 flat earth server, they don't argue logics, arguments, even stating that something points towards curved earth, "Give me ONE evidence proving earth is a globe". I didn't want to go into that cause one experiment alone other than taking picture of the eart h is not proof of earth. So I said I will discuss why the earth is NOT flat, I just listed a bunch of observations and asked how those are possible on FE. I said those are only possible on a cruved earth, they said "how is that proof of a ball earth", I said no it's not but it's definitly proof that the earth is not flat, but curved in an unknown angle. Im not saying I won any argument in any way or form but I don't think they enjoy that way of discussing. They seem to have this built in path of discussion where they end up in gravity not being proved, hence ball is fake, I have seen to many of these discussions that I want to follow that path with them.

HOW IS THAT CAUSE ON EFFECT?

Yeah, I don't want to go into those traps with them, it's not like you lose the argument, but it's never ending, nobody wins or lose. It ends up with that since we don't know everything about absolutly everything, everything goes, the earth might be flat, or it might be a ball so who's to tell. Even though just simple observation's proof that earth is NOT flat, even if it doesn't prove the earth is a ball. It's very simple to prove that the earth is not flat.

om muted

https://postimg.cc/jDv5CVRh/47d4e4a0

https://postimg.cc/0Kp5sFtD/cb608287

For the people who wants context to buzz aldrin apperantly saying that they never went to space: https://youtu.be/Y4UP6nRMuGs?t=428

great place 😛

Are these skyscrapers parallell? You would only know if you changed position to measure the angle betweent he surface and building, same as the parallell sunrays. The lines converge: https://postimg.cc/XXWCf4Rt/8a7df5d0

https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundial#Adjustments_to_calculate_clock_time_from_a_sundial_reading

they dont apply their own debate ethics to themself as they do to others

i let the other guy speak for 10 minutes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteinoid

Reproducable, observable, provable. Where can i observe the creator?

How do you know that ribosomes makes proteins?

I guess I have to use the 3 point checklist for science, made by random discord people who aren't scientist: Reproducable, observable and provable

i guess i will stick with actual scientist to explain what science is

there is nobody there

derek muted himself

Denial is a scary thing @Derek Nelson

You mean like the creator?

So scientists finding structurs, bones, human body in the ice being 10 000 years old, no conflict?

My proof is human bones over 10000 years old, dinsaur bones millions of years old.

So you deny that spesific evindence?, but ribosomes making proteins is true, those scientist you believe spesifically, you know that is confirmation bias, you choose to listen to the scientists which supports your fait

i beli9eve in scientists, difference is that i dont cherry pick

i dont act like i know more than them

the difference is that their scientific results doesnt support the bible

im not gonna beat around the bush

So you take a full face picture 2 cm from the nose?