Umwhat
Discord ID: 564979662246248450
695 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/7
| Next
that is the name of this server
that is the model yes, though I do not necesarilly agree
with everything
effectively they just say we don't know what those lights are
maybe planets maybe something we don't even understand yet
either way nasa has made cgi of them that we all believe
my question exactly
it seems ridiculous but they appear to be making all of it up
honestly though nasa has very few pictures of things they even claim to be from our galaxy
let alone outside of our galaxy
we can't see an atom
but I can draw you pictures of an atom
huh @raspberry
yeah they got rid of that a long time ago actually
oh yeah haha
but there are no official pictures of atoms
i think
like supposedly the electrons have no fixed positions, just probabilities
thx @woog I havent seen those bfore
but they are like, at least we have photos of earth
I wonder what the governtment actually knows
the first time we even went to antarctica is like 40s or 50s
then moon in 69
if they did find something in antarctica was nasa created to cover it up?
do you? I mean really
I believed it too
all of it
i am saying that is possibility
<:smart:484956754489376781>
grow up I just found that out like 2 months ago
they say, forget the moon we are going to mars...why forget the moon?
they say it a lot actually
i'll look for one
if you want it
im actually surprised you ahvent seen these
well my point is if any of this were real, they would build a base on the moon first
moon 230000 mi mars 33 million miles (at best)
๐ค
those are the actual distances they claim
try and find a picture of a planet that isn't cgi
idk probably
idk guy with rocket in profile pic
screw off then
๐ด
another day on our beautiful flat earth
Oahu hawaii?
gonna do some surfing lol
๐
flat earth is level and motionless
except for mountains canyons etc
the sun still exists
it is really small in FE model
hi @blackgirl
pluto is sometimes a planet sometimes not anyways
however if you don't believe in planets at all then you would say there are no planets
@mineyful darn forgot what that means
like in xmen the mutation gave them superpowers
the difference is that we say we do not know, but Nasa does not know either and they lie to everybody
<:nasalies:485141702403686403>
I honestly believed the Mars rover stuff but now I think that is BS too
think of how hard it would be to land on mars with a rocket from Earth in the globe earth model
I just think its all BS that's all
round like a dinner plate
If you are going to argue with flat earth you must understand that anything from Nasa is considered out of bounds
the only "planet" we can live and do live is Earth
to us on earth everyday, the earth appears flat and motionless
people began to theorize that maybe we live on a ball
that was the ancient greeks
people are always citing the ancient greeks they were just philosophizing
@Steve Angell I tell you I am new to all this but I am not buying we always knew the world was a globe
like what @๐ Spookmaster Jaqula ๐
another thing that is strange is that the world works without gravity
why is gravity needed @Kyriam_
@๐ Spookmaster Jaqula ๐ and you relaly believe that/
@๐ Spookmaster Jaqula ๐ that there is nothing pulling us up perhaps?
@Abe Lover shore
going
the problem with gravity is how much importance they have given it
in the FE model things still fall down
we can see that something falls, but that doesn't mean that if we jump we will keep going
that was my next guess
lol
he's blind right
the idea that the horizon is supposed to be the part of the ball that falls away is ridiculous
the cavendish experiment does not appear to be very scientific
and that is the only test for gravity
mass attracts mass experiment is only Cavendish as far as I know
things fall down
like cavendish
tell me how cavendish is the only experiment that shows gravity and that's enough
I can disprove it easily if we, with small objects could observe gravity then things would look completely different on the earth we know
things would just start rolling around towards larger objects
so hanging it from a wire negates that?
a building could easily then pull a smaller object
even over friction
"no it can't" that's right
we do not observe this to be true
hence cavendish is meaningless
they realized the flaws in mass attracting mass and invented GR
695 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/7
| Next