ingolfr
Discord ID: 261342662181781504
175 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
that's not true. they also want Mitt Romney dead
people like hotep will be our puppet rulers
the science of marxism tells us that behaviour is 0% heritable
probably a guy
wait really, I thought that was a joke
imagine being so brain damaged by the internet you don't believe in natural selection
yeah AOC invented not being fully capitalist or socialist
she did that
Giuli what was your response to Strauss' claim that Schmitt is still grounded in liberal moralising with his critique of liberalism
eh
that isn't even what Strauss says https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status/1353158944764657665
he says Hobbes in a sense laid the foundation for liberalism by treating the state of nature as a state of war as something to be controlled, compared to Schmitt's affirmation of the political as the state of war/nature
which is more like what Woods is doing himself
like that is exactly what he is resisting, the idea that nature is a state of war and that politics is about the possibility of war
I also didn't see how Strauss made the connection of Schmitt finding it desirable meaning that the idea as such was a moral idea
I see
pokemon anon sounds libt4rded
cool so all we need to dd to eliminate group conflict is have infinity resources
there's also the issue that people want to do more than just subsist
why's volkcialist so mad
humanity is a fiction
yeah they are lol
how old are you
old enough not to think things as simplistic as that
no I don't, it's not a particularly difficult concept to wrap your mind around
are you are of the concept of anti-fragility chungus
the human being needs to be stressed
ie. needs to feel pain
just as much as pleasure
he doesn't even understand the criticism
isn't that like a contradiction
still inflicting pain
it doesn't sound strange at all, it just sounds strange within your moral framework
if pain can be beneficial and pleasure harmful, that should point towards a more fundamental value than pleasure vs. pain
what if maximising pleasure is a self-detonating concept because you need psychologically to feel pain, and only feeling pleasure numbs your ability to feel pleasure
it is not a coherent concept
you started this by saying pain should be abolished
the optimal level of pain is right at your limit
there's a technical term for it that escapes me right now
the limit being the treshold between manageable and unmanageable
<:thinkingsuicide:793674864619683840>
you
yeah you could use utilitarianism to justify brutal tyranny if you wanted
at the most basic level it is the same as what aqua said
protection of the ingroup versus the outgroup/s
expansion of the ingroup
no you don't
well for one because different groups have different material interests
I tohught I demonstrated why it's not a valid concept
what I meant by you don't care for the outgroup as much as the ingroup, is if that if your vision of society is this liberal utilitarianism, that automatically puts you into an ingroup of liberal utilitarians that is in conflict with outgroups that don't want this vision enacted
one of the generals made a remark about the northern border on korea being so irradiated that the chinese couldn't cross through it
I think that was also MacArthur
isn't it funny that one of the liberal go-to insults is "closed minded"
17 is the proper age to be a liberal to be fair
even if one group somehow managed to completely genocide all their rivals and have complete domination of the earth, it would probably then fracture into separate groups
it's not about "basing it" it's about recognising it as a reality
Hitler actually beat up a reactionary politician
Mark Felton
I don't think so
it's a fairly unanimous attitude about fascism from communists at the time
... and since then
mix your GAYbour
a lot of leftists can't conceive of history by any other lens but the most vulgar economic determinism
10 years from now people will be posting Obama quotes about gay marriage to imply that actually progressivism is based somehow
I mean far right ppl
I thought this was that music reviewer for a moment
when the needle drops or whatever
pollyannaism
<:uhm:795724629066645556>
how was meto able to get on but giuli not
Giuli hates Nietzsche?
175 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2