The United States can win a conventional war against any Nation.

Change my Mind.

The United States isn't a Superpower.

It's a Hyperpower.

Russia or China aren't powerful enough to be considered Military Superpowers, **YET.**

What?

My message got deleted for whatever reason.

Yours did too.

Lmfao

Russia is slowly becoming a shell of what it could be.

It's sad to see.

Whos?

The United States, or India/China?

Oh.

I mean, I do like a few Chinese Cities.

Realist, the People's Liberation Army and the Russian Military both can't defeat the United States unless they absolutely nuke the shit out of them.

Nobody else except Russia and China could even really stand a chance in the long-term, anyway.

They'd need a gigantic alliance for that.

They will be, soon.

The United States is developing laser weapons designed to shoot down hundreds if not thousands of warheads almost simultaneously.

In my opinion, once those are deployed, that's the day we need to go to war.

I'd mention NATO but.. I don't think those guys deserve any references.

The U.S. won't suffer near as much as Russia will.

If it's just a plain 1v1, morals aside, then the United States can unleash firepower on a European Battlefield that makes World War II look like a joke.

Yes, but they dreamed their militaries could be as powerful as the United States.

*Bruh*

What am I saying that gets my messages deleted?

But, aside from that, it's silly to even compare the United States Military power in 2019 to WWII Germany or Napoleon's.

Yeah, they were massive, but that's what the United States *doesn't* need.

The technological disparity and the logistics between the two countries is absolutely insane.

I'm just simply saying that the United States won't lose as much as people assume.

Russia has threatened to absolutely nuke the shit out of everything (even themselves) if the United States even ATTEMPTS to fight them.

They don't want to fight us AT ALL.

Once we get those lasers, there's no issue.

It's all good in the neighborhood.

Ehh.. I mean, China's fate depends on how much they want to test us.

They want to try and sink a U.S. Aircraft Carrier because they think Americans are scared and won't do anything about it.

Killing 5,000 Sailors in the process.

The Pentagon told China we'll personally burn down Beijing ourselves if they did that.

China just simply isn't much of a military threat aside from naval, anyway.

Or nuclear.

I wouldn't count on it.

The United States would never let someone like Russia or China have the power we do or more.

So, I guarantee the moment they get on that road, they're going to get flamed.

China just isn't near as powerful as people think they are when it comes to military.

They don't really know what they're doing.

That's very true.

Russia has especially recovered from some shit.

Sorry, I'm talking to my friend about guns at the same time. Lmfao

Let me read this.

The U.S. won't owe anything to them if they're destroyed.

Oh, let me read.

Lmfao

You could take the next ten countries and go after the United States and you still wouldn't win. But, if I'm being honest, I doubt NATO will ever help the United States fight anything.

It'd just mainly be the United States against everybody, which isn't much of a problem.

You live in Europe?

That explains it.

Well, the United States protects your entire continent because none of your countries combined can do it.

Did someone leave your cage open or something, Ben?

I mean, the only problem I have with Europe is that they pretend they don't need the United States.

It's a team effort, and Europeans pretend like they are prepared enough to do everything themselves.

Well, maybe not the civilian populations.

I'm referring to their governments.

Poland seems like the only European Country with common sense when it comes to the next potential war.

Germany is trying to convince everybody that they don't need the United States after all.

I mean, if Europe wants to not trust us, and they think they can take on Russia by themselves, good for them.

It's their funeral, not ours.

They're barely considered allies.

Trump is the best leader we've had when it comes to making Military Decisions.

North Korea stopped its annoying-ass game when Trump stepped in as well.

The U.S. also engaged Russian "Mercenaries" with hundreds of Syrian Troops twice.

Trump was partially involved with that as well.

If anyone is wondering, yes, we kicked their asses and sustained no casualties or wounded.

Russia would kick any European Nation's ass who tried to conventionally fight it.

Well, Europe for one, especially the United Kingdom has been decreasing its Military Strength significantly.

They don't see war as a thing they must prepare for.

Numbers, specifically. They believe their current technology in smaller numbers is just as effective as the same equipment in larger numbers.

The National Guard is on the U.S. Mainland.

With a decent amount of Active Duty stationed there, but not awfully many.

The United Kingdom for one example is starting to get rid of most of their tanks.

Active Duty Troops are 9/10 out and about.

World War III isn't that likely for the next few years.

However, I'd say that a war with Iran might be.

Same, Filthy.

Americans mainly only really care about their Military Capabilities, if we try to learn more, we will and we try to get it right.

Europeans see anything about America and then generalize it.

It's the most annoying thing to talk with them about.

That's why it's relieving to see Europeans who actually have some sense in them.

What's your favorite country, in your honest opinion?

Yours too, Filthy.

Sweet. Why?

What are your favorite things about it?

I think it's been clear what mine is. Lmfao

That's really cool.

What are you guys' stance on guns?

I love Poland.