The second law of thermodynamics is also about an arrow of time but very cool, Flat Earthers!

Lolwhat

They do this to cheat their way so they can have science on their side but also not because they think the Earth is flat?

Yaa,

A weebaboo!

Japanophilie. Japanophilia?

<:happycube:507990858960732162>

<:lul:484994724118134784>

Lol what?

<:smart:484956754489376781>

@Human Sheeple

Okay.

Thanks, I guess?

Notice the transformation is gradual.

So, It makes sense!

@Human Sheeple What you are referring to is one exact gas next to a vacuum, (Which the Atmosphere is not), Until then, Similar to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics, Will reach Equilibrium, Which still keeps some atmosphere. The Earth's Atmosphere, However, Is not like that. The Pressure, Gas molecules, Weather, And even some atoms gradually decrease as you reach the vacuum of space.

Are you saying that.. There's an equal amount of Gas in the atmosphere..?

Dude, You said it yourself. It can't happen.

So It's gradual.

You just disproved your own statement!

So don't.

But yes, I can see where you're coming from.

I just.. Didn't appreciate you calling me a bird brain?

If you want, I can explain the third law of thermodynamics one more time to you.

Key word,

'Equillibrium'.

Because for some reason you don't believe in the atmosphere, Yet you believe in thermodynamics?

Okay, I'll post it for you, One more time.

If there was an atom (or several atoms) of gas layer then it would be sucked into the voice, Correct.

What did you even just post..? Isn't that spam?

I don't know what these links contribute to the current conversation, But okay!

Can you say that properly so I know what you just said?

Aerodynamics still apply even where there is atmospheric pressure.

Yeah?

Cool, Try this experiment for yourself. Take a vacuum chamber, (Which I doubt you even have), Then take a hypothetical cup of various gases. Now pretend there's such thing as 'Gravity', (To you), Then notice how the gases slowly but gradually fill out because the atmosphere **isn't 5 feet in length, It's ginormous.**

I notice you keep repeating the same statement about requiring a container but saying It's gradual really does prove a point, Does it not?

Do you have anything else to say besides 'containers'?

Cause I don't know if you cherry pick physics or not, But you need to make up or mind.

Freefall? Did you not hear me say 'Gravity'?

Read about General Relativity if Gravity confuses you too much.

Ask A Question, Do your actual research, Test that question, Analyze what you did, Then form a reasonable hypothesis.

Cool.

So let me explain to you the Magdeburg Hemisphere.

And?

Interesting.

I even said 'word for word'.

Anyways, I'll simplify for you.

So, When you have air inside the hemisphere is pumped out so it becomes a vacuum (equilibrium) It cannot be separated by a very great force. When air is pumped out (into the vacuum), The pressure inside the hemisphere itself becomes low (sometimes even very low). The Atmospheric Pressure exerts *a strong force* on the hemisphere, (the outer surface), Holding it all tightly together.

Did actual science never dawn upon you as a real thing..?

The outer surface, Being the hemisphere.

Did I not even explain that to you enough?

Cool, So now I have to explain what a hemisphere is to you, Too?

Are denying everything people throw at you?

It's a hemisphere in a literal physics experiment you can try yourself.

Did you even think to look up the 'Magdeburg Hemisphere'? It's a literal physics experiment I was talking about.

Not the actual Earth. Do you too, Deny Physics?

Yet you cherry-pick out Thermodynamics then call Gravity a hoax?

It demonstrates Atmospheric Pressure.

Give me a chance before you say 'wholesale DODGING' or 'fair tale spinning monkey ball religion' again.

A v-v-v-v-v-vacuum is a c-c-c-c-c-c-c-container?

The vacuum of space.

The 'container' you're referring to can be seen as Gravity.

But you deny that too, So why does it even matter, Man?

Okay, General Relativity.

Let's hope this isn't too complex for you.

General Relativity states that large objects with large mass causes a dent or depression in an interwoven space-time, Which causes Gravity. Similar to an effect of a bowling ball on a trampoline, But not exactly.

Also, Before you say anything about the 2D depictions they're depictions, We can't depict the 4th Dimension.

Okay, Delta Mass and Gravity exists (I can debate more about Gravity for you, Too).

changes

The literal Atmosphere and how it stays.

Gravity can accelerate an object with mass?

Of course it can.

Okay, It's mostly Gravity. I explained to you that Gravity causes this Delta Acceleration on this Delta mass, Hence keeping the Atmosphere down. So since you are so demanding;

Let's do an experiment.

Well, If you'de look how Gravity works, You know it is an electromagnetic force that causes acceleration on objects with mass. (Gas in the atmosphere) towards the *center* of the Earth. If I were in a large rectangular box with two objects on the other ends of the large rectangular box, And if I were going at high velocity, I am in an inertial frame, Relative to me. Also notice that the two objects would move towards *me* (I am in the center, In this theoretical situation). That is because the Earth's gravity pulls towards the center.

So..?

There's a lot of science and complex math to back up the existence of Gravity.

So what doesn't work in that situation?

How can it *not* be tried?

Let me explain something to you, Buddy. Science doesn't work that way. Everything, I mean *everything,* is a theory. It just happens to be that Gravity is a more logical theory that calling something disproved by all modern science correct.

So.. Really, The question is, *You* prove to me there isn't such thing as Gravity?

You prove to me now, With an experiment?

Also prove to me how that effects the flat earth theory? With an experiment. Right now. Do it.

You don't have to call me a religious fanatic or say I'm market DODGING something, Just answer me.

Then I'll have my final say.

Makes sense, **Right guys?**

Quit cherry-picking science.

I'm tired of you saying these things that contradict other sciences.

So, What's your theory to Gravity?

Because apparently that means the hypothesis is that when I drop this screwdriver right here It just floats, Mid-air.

Gravity accelerates objects with mass, But you're saying that Gravity isn't real?

Until I hear an actual *theory* or *hypothesis* that makes sense in science, I think I'm done here.

Okay. My question is, 'Is Gravity Real?'. I determine this Screwdriver has mass. I pick it up. I let go. It falls down, (Which is what Gravity is and does. It accelerates objects with mass towards the center). Huh?

Helium is lighter than air.

But, Okay.

Yeah.

So, Again, To kill 2 birds with 1 stone, Buoyancy. Buoyancy is an upward force, And everything requires equilibrium. (Think, A denser liquid than water sinks to the bottom, Less dense goes to the top). Mass does does not have affect on acceleration due to **gravity.**

It's like when a lighter object accelerates slower than heavy objects.

So.. Since the manipulation of Mass doesn't affect Acceleration, You *also* somehow believe in Gravity to an extent or do you not know what you're talking about?

Don't you think that's why helium **floats?**

Also, Buoyancy has a correlation to Gravity, Correct?