Yep. The famous double-slit experiment.

H0w dAr3 u 1nsUlT mAh S3xu@l1ty!!1!1!1!1

By the way, most millionaires didn't inherit their wealth.

You mean both being on the horizon? Well, refraction certainly plays a role. Plus, the entire earth is below you, so even if you're not quite directly between the sun and moon, if you go a few hundred miles closer to that line, you will be.

"Recently, PNC Wealth Management conducted a survey of people with more than $500,000 free to invest as they like, a fair definition of “wealthy,” and possibly “millionaire” once you begin including home equity and other assets. Only 6% of those surveyed earned their money from inheritance alone. 69% earned their wealth mostly by trading time and effort for money, or by 'working.'" Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/moneybuilder/2012/04/20/most-wealthy-individuals-earned-not-inherited-their-wealth-2/#5440ac221bac

@SeekingTruth No no no, airplanes use anti-gravity, not the Bernoulli Principle.

Joking about the people who don't think jet fuel is real @oink

"Exploitation of the working class." You mean entrepreneurship?

Not exploitation. It specifically said *working*

"Trading time and effort for money"

There's ALWAYS atmospheric refraction, and that wasn't even the only thing I mentioned.

I get so confused by SeekingTruth vs Seeker of Truth.

Nah, it's just a zoomed-in version of mine.

They cancel each other out?

🤔

Which are NOT mirror images of each other.

The southern sky is a lot more beautiful than the northern, in my opinion.

Too bad I haven't seen it in person.

"Only a fool claims they know what (the sun) is." " The close sun makes a full circle every 24 hours. "

a bit of a contradiction.

Right, because it's not like the southern sky has its own constellations.

Two celestial poles, lovely.

They apparently have; we just don't have photography from the stone ages.

https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.G2Xlpv4GXANokIkhCv_IlAHaF7&pid=Api&rs=1&p=0

*snaps fingers*

*head explodes*

Freedom of speech doesn't apply on private property.

^

The states are the government.

How does God = Bible? Is Christianity the only religion?

Hinduism is just odd.

You basically get to make up your own personal god.

!rank

@Bodhisattva I saw you in Seeking Truth.

Do explain.

That's an explanation of why it disappears, not why it doesn't shrink.

The sun appearing larger is an illusion.

Somebody did an experiment where they took two circles of identical size and placed one 40 feet above the observer, the other 40 feet ahead on the horizon. The observers insisted the circle on the horizon was 2, 3, even 4 times larger than the one overhead.

I also find it interesting how the sun doesn't appear to slow down as it sets.

Huh.

So the sun is on a curved path, right?

Why doesn't the equator see the sun curve at equinoxes? The rest of the world does not see the sun go in a straight path through the sky, but down there, you can.

The field causes the sun to appear in a totally different location than it really is?

Woah, care to be specific?

No, nuclear fusion generates energy.

Woah...

Dinosaurs are MAMMALS?

@Human Sheeple When did "they" admit to spraying viruses?

That was Imperial Japan generations ago.

What about the U.S.A. spraying its own civilians?

Yep, the world will end any 100 years now.

Why?

I thought 2028 was the year to talk about.

@Green Knight Do you even think conservation of momentum is real?

He's not a bot

It's basically like throwing a bowling ball. You're not pushing off the air, you're pushing off the ball and nothing else.

If rocket thrusters push off of air, it begs the question: What does the air push off of? You only need two components to get thrust, in this case the rocket and the gas from the thrusters. However, if the gas itself needs to push off of something else, then that something must do the same, and so on and so on. Infinite regression.

No.

The mass increases, not the density.

The total buoyant force increases, though.

By adding a second balloon, you've doubled both the mass and the volume, so they cancel each other out.

Which it obviously does if the helium balloons are identical.

Archimdedes principle

F = pVg

p = density

V = volume

g = gravity

The thing that facilitates the phenomenon you mentioned

Downwards force, as pointed out in the diagram you posted

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/564179895685742613/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190315045859.png

See that downwards arrow?

Yes.

So you admit to a downwards force and a normal force?

NET acceleration

If that upwards arrow overpowers the downwards, you will float.

You can set pVg equal to your weight to see how many balloons you need to fly.

You think this is made up?

You do realise that this equation is verified, right?

g is just downwards acceleration.

You can measure that by dropping stuff from a set height.

That's disregarding air resistance, buoyancy, etc.

It's just a belief that stuff accelerates at 9.8 in a vacuum?

And yes, nobody denies that buoyancy exists.

Same as sitting on a chair can bring your acceleration to 0.

Ah yes, I've seen this before.

There's this thing called elastic energy.

so before I address the feather, tell me, what provides the downwards force to being with?

Yes.

Yes, a change in net force will change net acceleration.

No

Cause: providing upwards force to overcome downwards.

But yes, lets continue

Try helium in a vacuum.

Actually, force IS the cause of acceleration.

What acceleration?

Yeah, waves have energy and they can transfer that.

It is.

The LIGHT has 0 mass, not the object being pushed.

I haven't been proven wrong, but we might as well move on.

Yes