we need some more election memes. where the meme gods at

* oh sorry* i'll whisper

how do christians know there religion is the correct one and not just a more ideologically advanced doctrine versus the quran. What distinction can be made rationally.

I watched that video and I was thinking about writing exactly why I felt it was inadequately answering my question, but decided against it.

to summarize... The things in which he proclaims makes his religion different , are in most part the things that make all religions different from each other.

I thought the end in which the other gentlemen discusses how the resurrections historical accuracy shouldnt be questioned interesting.

Need to look into it more

Im not about throwing the baby out with the bathwater...

I know some religious stories have decent moral value instilled in them

Jordan Peterson talks about that.

Those ideas can be separate from the religion is what I would suggest.

My initial question really asks why you believe Christianity, given the nature of other religions and how closely paralleled the believers can be to eachother.

the messages dont matter in that context.. because whether morally better or not the principles of any given doctrine are a matter of faith.

What do you mean morality is a christian worldview

So morality came from Christianity ?

I dont agree. I feel like you are going down a toxic conversation though corn.

I dont agree so im concocting some stuff, aye?

gotcha

blocking you corn

i'll talk to others who want a conversation

grow up

Morality is a method of being that produces results that are considered favorable for the livelihoods of individuals , but also for that of the society as well.

Its generally considered beneficial to not kill eachother . Not because christianity says dont do it.

if you understand fundamentally why not killing someone is better. You can make an educated decision.

ok but morality isnt grounded in a biblical worldview.

objectively you can conclude that based on what is most beneficial for humans to exist.

god is the source... lol

A humans right to life is granted not by a god but simply by having sentience. We know pain, and to inflict pain is wrong.

god doesnt need to tell us that.

thats my standing

You know its wrong to hurt others because you know what pain is.

Sentience is what does that.

mirror neurons

If you needed a god to tell you thats wrong, well... maybe they did back then.

i value humans not because god told me to, but because i value myself.

none of what you guys think comes from god " has " to come from god objectively.

I understand we will not agree here

thats fine.

im arguing with too many people 😄

Thanks guys.

That makes sense smash

but tying that in to a religion doesnt.

God can be separate from religion.

"creator" if you will

im leaving now though, seriously.

lol

All im saying is , if MKultra was what they were doing in the 30's - 40's.. What the fuck they doing now?

and theres people that want more government control knowing all the shit they've done thats documented

🤔

where can I read about Qanon... I've heard alot of people calling it crazy and being very very dismissive of it.

Dunno what its about ?

will look at it after this game

21 minutes into the video, and just dont understand why they would be so cryptic with there references. Or what the references purpose even is. They arent revealing any information.

And the dates would be difficult to verify on this stuff as well.. Can anyone verify any of the references as being legitimate time line wise? As in qanon posting something that later appears in a trump tweet ect ect.

I have GOT to be honest, and so far this seems like conspiracy bait. Really compelling stuff for people that enjoy it. Will watch more with an open mind though

almost like an ARG

I do think big tech and the media is establishment leftist - liberal biased.

the only way a civil war starts is if voter fraud is actually found

and trump takes office

the left would lose there mind

problem with other countries issues is when they become our issues

terrorism will eventually land on our doorstep if we dont intervene

should ask your doc about covid, see what he thinks.

If this was all a simulation, would you guys be mad or happy to have had the experience.

I think its alittle sad that being in a simulation would mean that we have no real spiritual or natural origin. Our thoughts and experiences would mean nothing.

I'd be mad

the brain might be more predictable then we know. the little we do know can determine a lot about a person.

they can fire electrical impulses into an animal to make one choice more appealing then another. Just saying 😄

IF that was true ( the i believe its a reddit post?) why would it not be front page news

if the servers contained VERIFIABLE proof of what they allege.

there would be zero reason to hide it

BOOM we sent our military to uncover the truth and the CIA wanted to hide it there was a firefight.

We won heres the evidence

its crazy guys come on

If we're being fair... big pharma has invented a lot of the medicines that make people with medical complications lives unquestionably better.

Pharmaceutical research has made life better, no?

you cant just say no

I think a lot of people would argue that it has made life better for a lot of people. i know people who have benefitted and chances are so do you 🤷

I see that people are prescribing motive to an innumerable amount of individuals that comprise "big pharma".

If that is there argument, I would ask for the evidence.

The people working on pharmaceuticals for a disease that effects 1 in one million people, would probably be a little upset.

Also have to consider that research cost, and the supply and demand of the product. This factors into pricing.

Now if there were cures for diseases that they aren't releasing to facilitate sales of there treatment..

But I doubt theres evidence of that.

So every one whos worked on a particular medicine have all been that morally bankrupt as to not care about the best cure?

I'd imagine there would have to be a long line of scientists , doctors , and researchers that have all decided , profit is better then providing mankind with cures.

But not even profit for themselves per say, because they can use there expertise elsewhere , right? So they would have to be doing this to benefit a CEO of a company.

Also a quick search on google of what drugs pfizer sells ( pfizer is the highest grossing big pharma company)

and you will see they sell drugs like advil, and viagra.

Mass market stuff

312 drugs in total for them

apparently over 20,000 clinical researchers work for them on development of these drugs.

Its a very tough pill to swallow, that all those people are working solely to make money for pfizer's top management and / or CEO

it could be, that these diseases they are trying to create drugs for, are just incredibly complex.

Isn't it also possible that a drug cannot solve the underlying issue? If you have something in your body that is not acting normally whatever the case may be, a drug might only ever be able to treat the symptoms.

thats a limitation in some cases.

a lot of cases i'd think.

pennsylvania can certify

but scotus can after hearing the texas case revoke certification. It means nothing

its likely biden is our president lets all be honest. Would be a miracle if trump wins this thing even though we all know fuckery is afoot.

this texas case is last straw

they denied immediate enjoining of penn certification