how do I join the communist party ?

@andi the shitpost 4 done

what are we debating ?

so we win the debate because libs are gay ?

@Charles Taze Russell proof ?

Capitalism and socialism are he same, we should go back to feudalism

@Charles Taze Russell how that I don't see it ?

which millions?

Can you prove your number, beside arguing that capitalism never killed ?

wikipediaTM

@Scipio how so ?

well these are assumptions, not facts

I'd argue that in capitalism people are always killed on purpose

Great Purge was exaggerated also purged existed under capitalism aswell

Holodomor was just a famine

36-38 purge

No

it wasn't

@Charles Taze Russell wikipedia is pile of shit, not facts

1936-1938 purge

that's the Great Purge

More over, the famine wasn't state imposed famine given the fact that Stalin ordered aid in his letters and also stopped the grain support because wasn't enough.

For example how US purges its fascist then communists.

UK did the same

France banned communism

Hitler literally purged his own party in 34

Did you hear about McCarthyism ?

Or how US was killing fascists in 40's ? and UK since 30's ?

The ban of communist in France ?

McCarthyism is a proof

lol

can't google ?

just copy past McCarthyism in your research

You are trolling and you are raging right now.

Did he troll you with facts as I do :))) ?

I don't think you even understand yourself

Wikipedia is not facts 😃

I gave you the info, you obviously know that, but you play dumb

I already answered

You asked me to give an example, I have you an example

I even mentioned others

yet you ask me for links, I told you you can fight absolutelly everything for that pedio

now attacks typo because can't argue

nor you do, sweetie 😃

I speak illegal immigrant only 😃

beside raving, do you have arguments ?

I can say the same about you, but you need to work more on how you argue than the language firstly 😃

I gave you a fact

and you play dumb

go ahead and make my day :))

So you admit I gave you an example, exactly what you asked me to do :)))

now I have the conversation to show that you admit, but you are playing dumb

No, you didn't

I said : McCarthyism

You just admitted it's an example

hoh

You asked for purges, now you backpedal.

And ideological purge isn't a purge ?

There were not 720,000 people

there 600,000 + out of which majority where pardoned.

Yet exited

A prost by a journalist, very relevant

even more

do you have any clue what a reliable source in this context mean ?

I can't post pics here

RIP

Well, the first article s backed by nothing. Has literally no sources

second one is the same

and the third one is the same

literally no source

I can write a blog and take it as sources

primary-hand or atleast second-hand sources

not articles, do you have any ?

If I take a shit and put it in a bucket and call it proof that Stalin killed 9147189749871487187 billions people, would you believe me ?

because I just listed you a source

if I can post pic I will give you sources and you can spend a week trying to refute them :)))

wait

out of which I have to point out that much those in 37-38 were commuted or even pardoned.

651,692 are for the period in which majority of them were pardoned or commuted.

these are only the sentences, but they were not carried out

executions is based of the number of sentences

you can look for the methodology if you question this

Before trying to look smartass when you are just pathetic, you would go to the sources and see the methodology.

Pls go and research that

lol, you need to buy glasses

typo

It's 4 in the morning didn't sleep 13 h, what's your excuse for being autistic ?

it's a common debate tactic by the lowest kind of people who can't argue . They try to direct the debate to something irrelevant such as typo

And I said, there are only sentences. You ask me for proof, I directed you for the methodology.

You refuse to do any research by yourself, not my problem.

It proves that you are lazy and retarded

But it's backing up

Do you literally know how much does it take me to go into the methodology and explain every single detail .

He's wasting my time. I directed him, if he wants to disprove me that the data shows what he claims, then take that data and disprove me:)

@Scipio You don't continue because you had enough of eating shit.

It's your turn , prove me wrong

"The same paper we used earlier can be applied to this section quite well, as it documents the soviet judicial system in its entirety. Getty records a total of 799,455 execution sentences during the entire 1921–53 period (including executions of criminals). Now, the distinction between execution sentences and executions seems small, but its of the utmost importance to note, especially considering vast numbers of people were released on amnesty after the purge, during the war and in many other cases. Furthermore, according to Sarah Davies’s 1997 “Popular opinion in Stalins' Russia”, slightly fewer then 300,000 arrests for anti-soviet activities during the 1937-38 period, when according to Getty, 85% of executions took place. I could also go into the specified execution ratios and many, many other data points implying a lower number"

as I said, Getty says take this in the methodology, but still doesn't believe making me to waste time more

this is one of the most blatant debate tactics, how to argue when you are dumb and full of shit.