that sarge was born like this

apparently

LOL

A FUCKING LEAF

actually cucked^

fucking based

@Sarge capitalist take away all of your freedoms

donald isl iterally suicidal

>Greentexting

^attention whore

sarge = attention whore

I'll fight flanon for you if you give me anal sarge

But then i get to impregnate your firstborn

it's a basic freedom

B A S I C

sarge freedom of speech and capitalism are incompatible because incorrect speech is punished via firing

cold take: communist & fascist should both get to speak

I actually support full freedom of speech, but I want the media to censor homosexuals, blacks and latinos

LOL

@Adoring Fan I support freedom of speech irl, just not on television and such

It's because i'm an american

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Dazhao

I'm fine with women wearing veils, but I think islam should be confined to historically islamic regions

Probably true, but most churchs are dumb

Especially anglo ones

^

What church is headed by a woman?

that's based on genetics

orthodox is the best

#christbolgang

>fair

women are property

personal property, not private property

@Deleted User Women's rights are illegitimate because they're not based on nature or will to power they derive from necessity of breeding in any given society. I became aware of this factor when I read a book on Syria (1). I saw the culture and history of the country, and noticed that the reason women have less rights in the country, (something I previously thought was due to the culture being backwards), is because it is necessary to keep the population increasing. In less developed countries, people die at a higher rate, thus it is necessary to begin increasing the rate at which people are born to compensate for this. This is the entire purpose of civilization (2), as this does not occur in pre-civilization society’s. Civilization was developed to seize the means of reproduction and production, which is why there was communal ownership of both (3). Tribal elders have control in either scenario (4); All relations are decided on a village level, this is because women are a commodity, representing reproduction, much like money, ever notice how women were often captured during tribal conquest? This is because women and gender is a social construct that exist due to the human desire to reproduce, which is the primary driving force for almost all human actions.

1: http://countrystudies.us/syria/
2: https://antinomiaimediata.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/capitalism-feminism-groundwork-i-female-economic-independence/
3: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-mutual-aid-a-factor-of-evolution
4: https://traditionsofconflict.com

traditionalism is the enemy

https://youtu.be/xvcPV5StLck

@Deleted User in primitivist societys women were communal proeprty that were controlled by the vanguard party

vnaguard party = vilalg elders

you're*

Excecuted.

Does it suck?

Why?

women just bring drama and feminize the workplace

they force everyone to stoop down to their level

@Aemon no lol

mldk have you ever met a woman? lol

have you ever worked with women?

technically my best friend is a woman, but she's a gynophile

women are a social construct

women are not as good workers

because they create drama

I want ot abolish women as a gender

How this can ocur is by advancing technology to allow robot breeding

therefore women will be defective men

and die off

wow thanks for the evolutionary anthropology 101

women are objectively weaker

so...

no they're biologically less capable

this is the problem with a lot of leftist

they act like things are controversial

when the science is settled

they're not sbudued

they're less biologicall capable of gaining strength

no mldk that literally doesn't logically follow

....

social constructs according to you are like gravity

you must think so to follow your logic

and again the entire premise is the scientifically false view that women are equally capable of building strenth

>it's social darwinism

are you trolling currently?

how much levels of low hanging fruit leftist talking points are you on?

that's literally not what you're saying

MLDK are you sewrious right now? You have a scientifically false premise and have ran with it to go on this whole like lecture where you show basic knowledge in evoanthropology

and a twitter knowledge of social constrcuts

Marx wouldn't say that

but marxist probably would

engels isn't a scientist

lol

deny reality

dney biology

go on tangents

use twitter-tier arguments

I did not

you literally just straw manned me

yes you do

mldk you're addicted to fallacies

you literally can't stop using them

and you can't stop going on tangents

like you typed like 3 paragraphs about a claim that we know is scientifically false

and you're just citing a sociologist from 200 years ago to try to disprove the scientific reality

that's true

I only siad that because i assume that's where you got your view from

because I don't know where else

you didn't get it from engels

because the letter doesn't even pertain to the logical conclusion of your argument

that being the scientifically flase claim women are biologically equal to men

You're just throwing words into your sentence

to make a bad strawman

women & men can be strong/daring