You gotta just cut out the moral pandering

some people think it was literally only about slaves because of how shitty the curriculum about it is

Becasue I can post pics there.

Only 3% of people owned slaves so how dose that benifit most white southers?

"Why did they mention slavery so much in their secession letters, then?"
Just because it was the linchpin or the trigger does not mean it was the sole or biggest reason.

thats not counting slaves right?

the percentage value, Aussie

There were also plenty of black slave owners in the south, as well.

yes there were.

that, too. I'm just asking because it's good to have your statistical facts in line

Aussie you don't do a whole lot of elaborating more than you just state off facts you probably saw on /pol/ like an Did You Know article or some shit

Here is an article about how slavery was back for whites.

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/114/

can you archive that?

and how credible of a source is it?

does it cite its sources?

The difference between the left and the right is the left want to leach of whites and then destory them and the right just want whites to have their own countires.

Becasue he lost the war.

It's better go out with a bang then go out with a whinper.

who are you even talking to right now dude

He's talking to us in Talk Room 4

It's called survival. I want slove this politically.

Right now you're coming across as nothing more than a right wing version of some tumblr fuck who slings uncited facts hoping whoever hes communicating to forgets the details of them immediately after

You aren't reading what I have given you so how do know what I am saying is wrong.

I don't doubt you on them but you come off as only halfway knowing what you're talking about

They are my citations to prove what I am saying sice you just say I'm wrong.

See, I literally just said I don't think you're wrong.

How well did you do in school?

He's arguing with me.

Not with you.

It would just be going back to the 1960's mate.

I'm just making observations about how he comes across

You should pop into TR4 and actually hear the other side. It might actually sound a little less one-sided

Oh i see what you're saying

no mic tho

It's like criticizing one half of a phone conversation

He doesn't have one either

that's why he's typing.

He's a poor-fag no-mic.

yeah but what I'm saying still stands. He doesn't come off as somebody who knows a whole lot

And you do?