Agree with Corsi that things will be quiet for a number of days

Thanks for expanding the board and the invite!

@SRVN Not sure I would believe Marfoogle Watutu News

@SRVN Agreed. He is compelling, but so are recent Q posts. There is heightened tensions, and clearly more military deployed, including domestic. Will keep my ear to ground. Thanks for posting.

Press Van Driver detained for having gun http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/white-house-press-van-driver-detained-gun-bag-article-1.3829597

Feb 18 2018 18:57:51
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
105
"For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."
:Protect 6/14-46
:Protect 6/14-46
Q+

@SRVN reading each others mind:)

Modern Pragmatisms define truth as contextual and paradigm dependent. Snow is white iff snow is white.

Jade II AI software https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiKBPmq37Yo

798
Feb 21 2018 00:11:10
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: b0b86f
448584
NEW
AG Sessions.
US Cyber Task Force.
Important.
Q

https://www.cnet.com/news/ag-sessions-cyber-task-force-will-tackle-us-tech-troubles-mueller/

Q is suggesting that his team is responsible for ensuring the USSS discovered the gun carried by the van driver of the Press corp.

@sojmed will need to do some research on this. TY.

@sojmed didn't realize they were so far ahead. Shit is right.

Better Source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-sessions-announces-new-cybersecurity-task-force

@nemos check out this doc re Russia connection. Q Post 836 https://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016.pdf

It is undeniable that Q provided a structure for anons to do good research, organize that research, and unite in purpose. It does matter if Q is not who he/she/them say they are, but it does not change our purpose and intent to create a second American Revolution. We are not really "a house divided," since we are all fighting for the same freedoms: Beanz, Corsi, Sathers, Antischool, Unirock, Defango, Lift the veil, etc. I do get why folks worry about profit motives, and as "consumers" of information, we can all decide what we pay for. It is time to refocus, promote freedom of speech, and quit killing our own warriors, instead of fighting together for the liberties we all care about.

We agree. The Q information, while it has changed in rhetorical style since October, has continued to point to very valid information. And you are right, there have been too many serendipitous "coincidences" that continue to confirm that Q is a source in the know. For that reason, I am still on board with Q.

There have been times when I have been uncomfortable with the "worship" of Q, but I also get that Q inspires great hope for real change and the fight against evil. In the end, we all need to keep our own discernment, do our own research, and make our own judgments....no substitute for personal responsibility. For this reason, I am fine with "courageous conversations" that raise tough questions and ask us to consider opposing views. Critical thinking is the foundation for free thinking. Frankly, these questions should make the Q movement stronger in the end, as we all get a lot clearer on why we are part of this movement.

@Deleted User Totally agree!:)

What I'm not liking is the "ad hominems" attack the person, responses, rather than attack the arguments. A lot of that going around on Reddit, YT and boards.

The only think I ever agreed with Michelle (Michael) Obama on is "when they go low, we go high." Of course, I didn't agree she/he ever did that--but I liked the sentiment!

So ironic too!