Sophie
Discord ID: 677229148648767499
4,286 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/43
| Next
You have to listen to the whole thing
So trump is spending millions on Facebook advertising, so he believes it is effective
Russia spend millions in Facebook advertising on behalf of trump
Therefore there is some amount of Facebook advertising that can swing an election
Of course itโs proof
Your argument fundamentally is that social media advertising doesnโt work.
And my argument is that, while you can argue itโs efficacy, it does something
And when you have an election that comes down to tiny tiny margins
(Trump won michignan by 2 voters per precinct)
Then thatโs the kind of margin that Facebook advertising can affect
It does not actually
The special counsel does not make any determination in the efficacy of Russian election hacking
Merely documenting that itโs efforts were extensive
Right now I am not claiming that
There you go.
hmm?
yup
Scottish are generally liberal
Compared to England
As is Wales
Eeeeh sort of
The Saxons were fairly unified prior to the Norman invasion
So your argument is that roger stone is inexorably linked to trump?
A bipartisan Senate majority voted to pass a resolution Thursday limiting President Trump from ordering future strikes against Iran without first seeking Congressโ explicit permission, in a pointed rebuke of his administrationโs resistance to involving the legislative branch in foreign policy decisions many fear could lead to all-out war
I for one am shocked by this brazen display of republicans doing their job
Lol trump admitting guilt
@sษชแด ษชsษดแดแดสแดสแด thatโs a lie. Job growth has fallen, capex as percentage of revenues has fallen
Lol
I love the right wing view of trump as just the driest comedian in history
No no the crimes are a commentary on crime
The parties donโt easily break along income lines
Democrats tends to have higher earning potential, republicans tend to have more equity
But thatโs largely a function of age
Yeah Iโd say Republican policies almost universally favor the wealthy
I think the Dems are the party for a more equitable society
Which means Dems are the party of the middle class and class mobility
No
Lol
Republicans have always been the pro business party
Since Nixonโs southern strategy, and really cemented in Bushโs 20014 campaign
*2004
Theyโve run a right wing identity politics play
To cobble together a coalition
...
That was literally the name of it
Uuuuh ok just look at an electoral map I guess
This is a weird thing to argue against
Anyway, thereโs been a tension at times in the Republican Party between the populist right wing (which includes the very poor) and the business interests (which include the very rich)
Trump was in a way the victory of the populist right (racist/anti-immigrant/protectionist) against the pro-business right
The dem coalition is a different beast, at least since 65
Relying on unions (middle class) urban poor and blacks
But thatโs been changing as the cities change, and now educated white suburbanites, which used to be solidly republican are leaning left
So to answer your question, republicans are the party of the ultra wealthy and the rural poor, democrats are the party of the urban middle class and educated suburbans
@BarronVon uuuh Republican areas are older, less educated and more rural
I donโt think that IQ map would show what you want it to.
Emboldened after his impeachment acquittal, President Donald Trump now openly admits to sending his attorney Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to find damaging information about his political opponents, even though he strongly denied it during the impeachment inquiry
Trump is a whiny little bitch
Thnx for coming to my ted talk
Mods are not asleep ppl
Stop trying to skirt the rules
Iโm guessing @luke5135 doesnโt have a valentine?
๐
Trump is a prime example of an extraordinarily pathetic male specimen
Strong whiny incel vibes
Fat ugly and stupid is not a great combination
Lol
*Nazi propaganda is not tolerated on this server*
/Commands
Help
/help
-warn @Englishman123 Nazi propaganda
Bulgaria is not an ancient people.
Itโs classical
Or even early medieval
Ok
Everyone existed before they settled their modern day lands
The question is when that national identity arose, and it was post Roman conquest
... Christianity is literally the aftermath of the Roman Empire
Vice-versa.
The Saxons predate the Germans
And the high Germanic tribes were the Celts
Yes, low Germanic people
Germans =/= Germanic peoples
The Saxons predate the โGermansโ
Germanic
Not German
The danish are low germanic too
Yes
Well the Frisians
Yes, again
The โGermansโ are a much newer invention
The Germans as a single national identity didnโt come around until Charlemagne
Both Saxony, Wessex/Essex had already been around for hundreds of years
The collapse of his empire in the 1800โs?
4,286 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/43
| Next