Ed
Discord ID: 670913144503271425
651 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/7
| Next
> Most Men have preferences but no standards
> Women have standards, and preferences within the subset of people that meet their standards
@stem
@FriendlyOldHans42
One leads to the other in a way
Mgtow is the only logical reaction to the social structures that promote female parasitism
Mgtow is the only reaction to a social structure that disadvantages men that choose the family life
Therefore their instincts are anti-truth if the truth hurts
In a way illegal immigration is less of a money drain than illegal immigration
Although they can saturate certain labour pools and lower the wages of the indigenous workers
Illegal immigrants can also vote and sway election to give themselves amnesty
> their usury just works different
@TuerSchlossEnteiser
Enlighten me
> its not about religion.. its about entire CIVILISATION
@virtue#636
European Civilisation is the outcome of whatever software(religion) is running on the brains of Europeans
What I am really opposed to is the fractional debt lending system
Fractional debt lending would be eliminated in an Islamic finance system though
The Islamic ideal is far from the low trust society(semites) that hosts the religion
Yeah pedophilia is also in Islam so I am by no means an advocate
> Well, isn't America literally that?
@Big Ben
Nah settlers conquered the land
And displaced the population
That's the opposite of the nation of immigrants meme
OK
Supermajority white European
They're similar enough to coexist under one rule
European high trust culture only works within a certain iq range
And it requires the ability to extensively delay gratification
You also need the appropriate value system to sustain a high trust culture
IQ heritability is the same as height past a certain age
> @Ed do you know what regress to the mean means?
@BeautyIsEternal
The probability of a freak accident genius in subsaharan Africa having a son who is also a freak accident genius is lower
Than the probability of him having a son that is closer to the average
We're talking about a mathematical expression of the probability that the child of a high IQ bantu also has a high IQ
> Besides, can't we use eugenics to raise the average IQ of this hypothetical new american ethnicity?
@Big Benif you're smart enough and wise enough to recognise the benefit of eugenics
You're in less need of eugenics than most
> Regression to the mean, really as far as I see it, is when geniuses have babies who are normal IQ, which is normal. A genius is a rare combination of genes of personality and IQ that give someone the ability to produce novelty. I do not think it needs term, as it is just basic genetics. We don't have a term for advancing away from the mean, do we? @Ed
@BeautyIsEternal
This is bypassing the point that i am trying to make
African Individuals with average IQ(by white standards)
Are less likely to have children who also pass the same threshold
Thereby making it difficult to integrate Africans into white society
In the long term @BeautyIsEternal
Christian at the time were systematically murdering or banishing their underclass
Which essentially gave them a long term advantage
Regardless of all that Christianity was,
It won't be an efficient countermeasure to the subversive forces at play
The new value system has to take into account the faults of the previous value system or it will fail just the same
The system(in it's own fucked up way) will leech off all those that produce
And give more to the lower class parasites
That's literally dysgenic
Even homesteads have to pay property taxes in many states
That's even more disgraceful @Rody Le Cid
Some CryptoCurrency systems are self regulating to minimize inflation
It could be the United States trying to maintain economic dominance
Technically the corona virus is causing an automatic sanctioning of China
No?
Physical harm is relative to the individual
Plastic surgery involves cutting you open and stitching you back up
Is it harmful in that sense?
My concern is that chopping off parts or digging a hole in your body
Hasn't proven to even have longterm psychological benefits
You can just pick the gametes that have genes that correlate with IQ
Even the low IQ underclass would benefit to some degree from having high IQ
It's from the book about how your nations average IQ matters more than your individual IQ
Yeah but the thing that worries me is that the apparatus that measures for IQ could get corrupt
plebs are trying to shift people's attention to "Emotional Quotient" rn for example
Autism causes a social disadvantage that kinda forces folks to expose themselves to other social outcasts(dissenters)
It's like a computer with a shitty WiFi adapter not being able to download the corrupt software that is the new operating system
I think most centrists, if not hendered by their emotional impulses, would gravitate towards the logical endgame of the ideas they hold
But autists (as far as I can see) seem to be less capable of cognitive dissonance, which is a useful social instrument
I think most centrists, if not hendered by their emotional impulses, would gravitate towards the logical endgame of the ideas they hold, which leads to extreme positions
But autists (as far as I can see) seem to be less capable of cognitive dissonance, which is a useful social instrument
This also explains why a shift in a small subset of your premises can have an immediate effect on your entire outlook
@Miniature Menace
Yeah
It's also possible that they are simply doing the exact opposite of what I am saying
And blindly trying to climb a social heirarchy they can't fully comprehend the beginning or end of
Memes are not expressions of the underlying logical basis of an ideology
But rather an expression of emotional reactions and social norms that the viewer is expected to adhere to
They're rhetorical instruments that allow us to market/normalize more complex ideas that would never fit in a single frame
I am always fascinated by how people don't feel the urge to trace back the system of incentives and causal relationships that lead to the undesirable consequences they're dealing with in the present.
They don't try to integrate the data available to them into an overarching theory with predictive ability
Collective ownership and private ownership are both necessary to maintain a healthy civilisation
But if the collective decides who possesses private property then it was never private property in the first place
@Nerthulas
The commons require the sharing of responsibility
private property requires individual responsibility
And not changing the course costs the security of the private property of every individual by principle
651 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/7
| Next