t!daily

Just go to work in clownface

Good eye, I thought he was at least 40 something lol

t!daily

Many thanks

t!daily

t!daily

t!daily

Is there any such thing as randomness in nature then?

I would say the former, in my opinion. Unless by histories you mean interpretations of the events themselves

Well I suppose that depends on your view of time, i.e. linearity or a sort of ever-present existence

but one might say there's only 1 way that is was

*it was

exactly

is there only one present, in your estimation?

is existence defined by perception? does the past change when you misremember something?

But wouldn't the past be implicit in the present? even if it is just simulated

Chess is an interesting analogy, though I don't know how apt it is, it reduces the importance of momentum in that scenario

if I'm mid jump, I'm either on the way up, or on the way down. You may not be able to tell in a freeze frame, but the next frame will make it obvious

certainly

I suppose it is theoretically possible, but the particular alignment of any moment in reality, or even one brain configuration, is so infinitely complex that the odds of something happening any different way are so nearly impossible that it's negligible

in an infinitely large universe, sure; but as far as our experience can reach

^that is what I started to say at the end there

interstellar