Positive stereotypes are still stereotypes.

My correct opinions are disfavored by the general populace.

Sex is fun.

Porn is only bad in the way it commodifies objectification of the human form, sexual promiscuity is fine when practiced safely, and degeneracy is a fash term.

NS?

Oy vey, goya, it's a conspiracy.

@Deleted User Well it's counterrevolutionary as fuck.

Sucks for men if that chart is ultimately founded in truth, lol.

People are just less happy nowadays, and it's pretty clear to me that you can't derive some conclusion among the complex of factors from just one or two of them.

Would call it sad, but okay.

Bloodlines are pointless because they all mix more and more over time.

Oh well.

@Deleted User Suuuure.

@Deleted User My rebuttal is that race is stupid and biologists don't see it as useful or even real, and you're trying to protect something so stupid and arbitrated that frankly, I just wanna see it destroyed, if it would mean an end to this racial chauvinism.

I support putting neo-Nazis under the ground.

The ones who won't give up, that is.

Falangists are not left wing.

It's not that they're degenerates, it's that they're shitty reactionaries who think that streamlining a culture will someone bring them into a better standard of living and give you a purpose in the universe.

Well I appreciate the clarity.

I'm biasing?

I'm not talking about race here, buddy.

What about economic conditions?

It'd be pretty cool to shoot a Nazi through the face with a Mauser C-13.

<:seal:312037860570169345>

Naw, nothing edgy about pest control.

All people are people.

It's just that fash are shit.

Because they observe the economic conditions and deduce "It's the working class's fault."

That's the bootlickingest bullshit ever.

You're right, but they either blame the working class people for demanding too much, or they blame a demographic like (((them))) or THE GAYS! All of these positions are preposterous shit.

What matters is the ruling class, IDGAF who is in it. The results of their actions are observable.

Everybody can be proletarian, even shitty reactionaries.

Only people who are not in the working class cannot.

@Deleted User Reactionaries are literally reacting to a proposed change in the status quo.

Centrists and fascists in a capitalist nation, for instance.

That's the definition.

@Deleted User You are arguing in bad faith, I straight up said the opposite of what you deduced.

Marxists can't be reactionaries because they are insisting on a new system.

Reactionaries act in preservation of the system.

At least you're admitting you don't care about what worda mean.

Connotations are nonliteral meanings.

I'm giving you literal meanings.

Yes, you can contextualize an alternative meaning, but that doesn't mean that you are honoring the literal meaning.

Philosophers, rhetoricians, linguists, generally people in positions where they are arbitrating definitions over an academic set of maxims.

I guess it's an appeal to authority, but that doesn't make it wrong. I also just jumped onto Google to support my claim on the definition of something.

I used a source from people I hate?

Do you mean to say that I can't take care to scrutinize and discriminate carefully when I jump onto a search engine?

I'm not a primitivist.

Capitalism can best be destroyed from within.

@Deleted User Russia was feudalist, and they upended it through a state capitalist model.

@Deleted User Not really so when I apply a set of simple media literacy tools.

1. If it seems too good to be true, you might want to double or even triple check it.

Anyways yes, capitalism is probably less likely to just collapse in America. It would happen sooner in Russia because of the economic conditions, even with the Siloviki.

@Deleted User Vouchers are okay, but that stuff is more mutualist/de Leonist/anarcho-collectivist.

Woah, people on YouTube just opine?

Look at all these "rational skeptics"™ on YouTube!!!

@sleeping zzz A lot of those people on YouTube aren't skeptics, correct. They're just people who claim to be rational while simultaneously doubting evidence, as opposed to being skeptical about arguments that aren't universally true.

@sleeping zzz Nah, she just posted Nazi channels, it's just more people replacing reality with their own form of "truth."

The universe is pretty cold an empty, huh?

@sleeping zzz Not really, it's just an advocacy for equity. What are you trying to defend?

Muh all sides.

Muh both sides.

@sleeping zzz Worse than?

^^^

>ultimate race
>vulnerable to black dicks

So fucking ultimate.

Germany trying to ruin the world a third time, lol.

I'm not Hispanic.

"If you cannot convince a Fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement."

I'm white.

Why are you so obsessed with race?

@Dushman You get it.

Always gotta blame the little guy while Porky drinks your blood.

GJ

@Deleted User Naw, they actually have a ton more to offer those people than fascists and capitalists do.

Fascizts: We have homogeny
Capitalist: We have a couple rich people and a shit ton of poor people.

Yee

There is no third position, it's still right wing.

It's shit.

Nazis get the bullet.

Naw, I'm right.

No, it's super unwoke.

"Kill all the Jews in the ruling class, but ignore the rest of the ruling class."

<:porky:315615014751043588>

Porky rubs his hands together as the chinless Nazi kills the Jew banker "Aha, now there's even less competition."

I don't care if the banker is a Jew or not, he's scum.

No, a lot of the world's banks are run by Roman Catholics, atheists, all kinds of people. The religious diversity of the banker is hilarious.

Any other opinion is denialist.

(((THEM!)))

With the help of capitalist nations intervening.

Naw.

I guess a Strasserist.

Not a Nazbol, though.

It is reactionary, it was written in response to communism in Germany.

It was a reacrion to the invention of communism.

@Deleted User I've read a bit of it.

With dramatistic criticism applied to it.

The hidden motives are pretty obvious.

Everyone has the capacity for good.