Verchiel
Discord ID: 181545221916459009
3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 5/33
| Next
If I live in a local community that's homogenous/that I appreciate, I'm going to worry for a set of values that supports their wellbeing.
Yeah sorry, but it's rooted in *identity*
Not cultural ideology
Cart comes before the horse
Human beings are not clean slates, they're born with/into something
And I'm telling you that *the study doesn't rebut me*
"Cultural ideology" is an extremely dubious and loaded term here
We use the word *identity* for a very obvious reason
Ideas or ideologies may be changed, sometimes much like how we change pants
An identity is rooted in the race and culture of the individual, generally *organically* developed throughout life, and not necessarily equivalent to *doctrine*
That's that Frankfurt School shit
Racial and cultural identity. Your innate physical characteristic, geographical location, and socially acquired mannerisms
Yes, but most whites vote republican. Overwhelmingly, in most areas of the United States, being liberal is *not* synonymous with group preference/social status
And tbqh that's still besides the point. Race plays a role, but in a more local setting. Race sets the stage for *familiarity and the ability to adopt an idea*
So let me give you an example
So let's say some Jew comes in and convinces the leaders at my club that cross dressing is synonymous with good health
>Still the population majority
>Lives in urban areas
**Race plays a role, but in a more local setting. Race sets the stage for familiarity and the ability to adopt an idea**
You're not considering race as a factor for association
I told you **it is, but in localized areas**
Not as a wide pervasive item genetically predisposing people to vote a particular way
Well, we see people associating based more on race than culture generally within the U.S.
Go look at a racial dot map
Then it shouldn't take a rocket scientist or two skips of a stone
To suggest that ideas are going to pass by association
Because race is a major arbiter of the manner of association between and within groups
๐คท I mean, they kind of are; that's why niggas migrate here and don't tip the applecart. They will however tend to compete by class.
Which is natural
They don't ruin the country whenever they migrate here from Europe. They typically behave like the rest of the Whites in the community.
There is however, and for obvious reasons, a divide taking places in the White communities within the U.S.
Urban v. Rural
The gradient is typically like this:
Urbanites are liberal
And so on
Rural Whites are generally conservative
Pozz in academia, Jews etc. we can see why, but it gets a bit more *nuanced*
There is a different selection process occurring within cities versus within rural areas
Selecting for status within an urban area is going to be different than in rural areas
Whites are verymuch status seeking creatures, and this is a horrible trait when the cultural order becomes subverted
It doesn't help either that the higher IQ block of the White population (Nords, Anglos, Scands) are very culture dependent and have shit group preservation instinct
Status is synonymous with group security to them, so they'll tend to shit the bed
*if you consider liberalism as ruining the country, they kinda are by being majority liberal*
If you can find me some data on European migrants tilting counties, then I'll believe it
+++
Well yes ofc. But like I showed you with the Swedes, you need to look at the polling data
Remember when we talked about the impact of foreign contact on host population?
The southern swedes are voting conservative
Northern Swedes are voting liberal
Guess which ones live in close proximity to the immigrants?
Precisely. But still we're seeing very interesting process as we see the populations become convinced.
Here's my take on it:
By whatever method, the cultural norm is under reformation.
Pozz is introduced, becomes the pinnacle of perceived social status.
Plebs idolize the pozz en masse, especially if they're Scands, Nords, or Anglos
Or R1b/R1a generally
Anyone who doesn't is ostracized
If you live in a country, like Sweden, where being culture bound is very tied to social navigation, this is a fucking immediate jump off a bridge for the entire group
Because that means every lemming and their grandmother will adopt the new fad as sacrosanct, and you can't do shitall about it
It's only when the consequences of the pozz, like immigration, actually hit the people
It shakes their group preservation instinct
So they start reacting, generally en masse
Regardless of Jews or whatever, we know that these pozz values are being passed to the governing first, through association with 'international politics'
It's a top down march off a proverbial cliff
Yeah I was about to say
""""National interests"""" which entail """accidentally""" starting a satanic pedophilic cult. ๐คธ
t. CIA
The state is obviously bloated and needs to be weeded out severely
Well, the problem is keeping them subservient whenever they embezzle or fuck up
Which has become nigh on impossible at this point
They also become their own little clique bodies that do shady shit
@Jumoz Why are you tagging me?
You're either highly neurotic or an excellent troll.
๐ฏ
I dont necessarily disagree with any of this, but I think its quite apparent that these agencies take shits frequently.
And can just be bought out (e.g. EPA FDA)
The State Department (Jews), the CIA
They're hardly monitored for conduct, they'll go ob reckless spending adventures (Pentagon)
A lot of shit needs to be thrown out (and people hung, tbh)
I dont disagree with having federal agencies, I disagree with how they're run and who runs them. I think everyone, to a certain extent, is of this opinion.
The media lies. What else is new. ๐คธ
Also, the things you notice:
GDP per capita approx. -> IQ approx. -> *race*
GDP follows IQ on average with little to no caveats
Also, you just rebutted your own statement and then told me it doesn't hold up
They're the ruling class bruh
The only main caveat is oil and foreign investment, afaik
*Time will tell if your theory holds up, because india has a big diversity of iq with respects to north and south, but was set back almost 70 years of time that couldve been used to develop its capitalism because of british colonization*
Oh no no no
***that couldve been used to develop its capitalism because of british colonization***
๐ No no no
๐
Britain civilized Indian, raised literacy, and built infrastructure
Slow down shhh lol.
Ashkenazim IQ average =/= Israel national IQ average
For one.
Two, Lynn and Van. have a paper on this with an established correlation, which has been criticized but never formally rebutted:
*The book includes the authors' calculation of average IQ scores for 60 countries, based on their analysis of published reports. It reports their observation that national IQ correlates with gross domestic product per capita at 0.82, and with the rate of economic growth from 1950โ1990 at 0.64.*
3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 5/33
| Next