Verchiel

Discord ID: 181545221916459009


3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 5/33 | Next

If I live in a local community that's homogenous/that I appreciate, I'm going to worry for a set of values that supports their wellbeing.

Yeah sorry, but it's rooted in *identity*

Human beings are not clean slates, they're born with/into something

And I'm telling you that *the study doesn't rebut me*

"Cultural ideology" is an extremely dubious and loaded term here

We use the word *identity* for a very obvious reason

Ideas or ideologies may be changed, sometimes much like how we change pants

An identity is rooted in the race and culture of the individual, generally *organically* developed throughout life, and not necessarily equivalent to *doctrine*

Racial and cultural identity. Your innate physical characteristic, geographical location, and socially acquired mannerisms

Yes, but most whites vote republican. Overwhelmingly, in most areas of the United States, being liberal is *not* synonymous with group preference/social status

And tbqh that's still besides the point. Race plays a role, but in a more local setting. Race sets the stage for *familiarity and the ability to adopt an idea*

So let's say some Jew comes in and convinces the leaders at my club that cross dressing is synonymous with good health

**Race plays a role, but in a more local setting. Race sets the stage for familiarity and the ability to adopt an idea**

You're not considering race as a factor for association

I told you **it is, but in localized areas**

Not as a wide pervasive item genetically predisposing people to vote a particular way

Well, we see people associating based more on race than culture generally within the U.S.

Then it shouldn't take a rocket scientist or two skips of a stone

To suggest that ideas are going to pass by association

Because race is a major arbiter of the manner of association between and within groups

๐Ÿคท I mean, they kind of are; that's why niggas migrate here and don't tip the applecart. They will however tend to compete by class.

They don't ruin the country whenever they migrate here from Europe. They typically behave like the rest of the Whites in the community.

There is however, and for obvious reasons, a divide taking places in the White communities within the U.S.

The gradient is typically like this:

Rural Whites are generally conservative

Pozz in academia, Jews etc. we can see why, but it gets a bit more *nuanced*

There is a different selection process occurring within cities versus within rural areas

Selecting for status within an urban area is going to be different than in rural areas

Whites are verymuch status seeking creatures, and this is a horrible trait when the cultural order becomes subverted

It doesn't help either that the higher IQ block of the White population (Nords, Anglos, Scands) are very culture dependent and have shit group preservation instinct

Status is synonymous with group security to them, so they'll tend to shit the bed

*if you consider liberalism as ruining the country, they kinda are by being majority liberal*
If you can find me some data on European migrants tilting counties, then I'll believe it

Well yes ofc. But like I showed you with the Swedes, you need to look at the polling data

Remember when we talked about the impact of foreign contact on host population?

The southern swedes are voting conservative

Northern Swedes are voting liberal

Guess which ones live in close proximity to the immigrants?

Precisely. But still we're seeing very interesting process as we see the populations become convinced.

By whatever method, the cultural norm is under reformation.

Pozz is introduced, becomes the pinnacle of perceived social status.

Plebs idolize the pozz en masse, especially if they're Scands, Nords, or Anglos

If you live in a country, like Sweden, where being culture bound is very tied to social navigation, this is a fucking immediate jump off a bridge for the entire group

Because that means every lemming and their grandmother will adopt the new fad as sacrosanct, and you can't do shitall about it

It's only when the consequences of the pozz, like immigration, actually hit the people

It shakes their group preservation instinct

So they start reacting, generally en masse

Regardless of Jews or whatever, we know that these pozz values are being passed to the governing first, through association with 'international politics'

It's a top down march off a proverbial cliff

""""National interests"""" which entail """accidentally""" starting a satanic pedophilic cult. ๐Ÿคธ

The state is obviously bloated and needs to be weeded out severely

Well, the problem is keeping them subservient whenever they embezzle or fuck up

Which has become nigh on impossible at this point

They also become their own little clique bodies that do shady shit

You're either highly neurotic or an excellent troll.

I dont necessarily disagree with any of this, but I think its quite apparent that these agencies take shits frequently.

And can just be bought out (e.g. EPA FDA)

The State Department (Jews), the CIA

They're hardly monitored for conduct, they'll go ob reckless spending adventures (Pentagon)

A lot of shit needs to be thrown out (and people hung, tbh)

I dont disagree with having federal agencies, I disagree with how they're run and who runs them. I think everyone, to a certain extent, is of this opinion.

The media lies. What else is new. ๐Ÿคธ

GDP per capita approx. -> IQ approx. -> *race*

GDP follows IQ on average with little to no caveats

Also, you just rebutted your own statement and then told me it doesn't hold up

The only main caveat is oil and foreign investment, afaik

*Time will tell if your theory holds up, because india has a big diversity of iq with respects to north and south, but was set back almost 70 years of time that couldve been used to develop its capitalism because of british colonization*

***that couldve been used to develop its capitalism because of british colonization***

Britain civilized Indian, raised literacy, and built infrastructure

Ashkenazim IQ average =/= Israel national IQ average

Two, Lynn and Van. have a paper on this with an established correlation, which has been criticized but never formally rebutted:

*The book includes the authors' calculation of average IQ scores for 60 countries, based on their analysis of published reports. It reports their observation that national IQ correlates with gross domestic product per capita at 0.82, and with the rate of economic growth from 1950โ€“1990 at 0.64.*

3,272 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 5/33 | Next