Remember when we talked about the impact of foreign contact on host population?

The southern swedes are voting conservative

Northern Swedes are voting liberal

Guess which ones live in close proximity to the immigrants?

see if we're gonna get into the specifics of policy then we can't use broad stroke definitions like left v right

immigration specifically will change as more people see the problems with mass immigration

it's a steadfast position of the left for now, but it won't be for long

like when we compare these 2 charts:

we see that the left v right dichotomy leans left inherently

even more so here

Precisely. But still we're seeing very interesting process as we see the populations become convinced.

Here's my take on it:

By whatever method, the cultural norm is under reformation.

Pozz is introduced, becomes the pinnacle of perceived social status.

Plebs idolize the pozz en masse, especially if they're Scands, Nords, or Anglos

Or R1b/R1a generally

Anyone who doesn't is ostracized

If you live in a country, like Sweden, where being culture bound is very tied to social navigation, this is a fucking immediate jump off a bridge for the entire group

Because that means every lemming and their grandmother will adopt the new fad as sacrosanct, and you can't do shitall about it

It's only when the consequences of the pozz, like immigration, actually hit the people

It shakes their group preservation instinct

So they start reacting, generally en masse

Regardless of Jews or whatever, we know that these pozz values are being passed to the governing first, through association with 'international politics'

It's a top down march off a proverbial cliff

it could be, my brother who works in policy in D.C. says generally dominant political ideology swings back and forth like a pendulum

he cites the 70s-80s conservative boom, which swung into the 90s-10s liberal boom, and is slowly moving back towards conservativism

seems like rules are being broken left and right in his theory though, since this pendulum swing is greatly influenced by the internet's ability to let people communicate with each other

not to mention the clear effects of political polarization

doubt we'd be nearly as polarized in the 70s

Yeah I was about to say

especially considering nixon made the precursor to the EPA

and opened international relationships with china to the west

plus this era's economy is so much more complex than the 1940s that federal agencies and their massive bureaucracy is almost completely necessary for proper regulation of our markets

despite literally being unconstitutional based on delegation theory, but the supreme court has to keep up the facade that it isnt unconstitutional because eliminating federal agencies will probably destroy our country's economy, environment, ability to enforce laws, and nuanced regulation of massive points of national interests

like welfare <:gunpepe:619749635224895518>

""""National interests"""" which entail """accidentally""" starting a satanic pedophilic cult. 🤸

t. CIA

The state is obviously bloated and needs to be weeded out severely