or maybe its uncredible

I cant even dispute it without methodology

but the amount of scientists you are implicating in the same political ideology is ridiculous, many of these people simply follow data and have integrity

its not a feasible coverup

even if universities were supposedly leftist

there would be a ton of outliers

even under capitalism

@ashoka Some video of berkely protests isnt evidence of that, the internet makes it so easy to make everything overblown

my point is basing your values off of trends in youtube videos or articles is a mistake

and travelling and talking to others

makes you realize how similar you are to them

^^^

@ashoka What if they werent a representative of their entire race?

what if it was some asshole

or the town you were in

what if the way people are raised and their environment is the largest factor

and socioeconomic background

or is it just some genetic trait that the entire scientific community is lying about

they are made by history

Guns, Germs, and Steel

geography

resources

animals

ideas

culture

European nature does not always promote progress and that is an oversimplification of history not to mention how subjective progress even is

and the various exploitations by Europeans after achieving dominance

affecting the culture forever

I doubt you see it that way

really

You talk of them like another species though and theres just not enough to back that up,

it doesnt even fit natural selection

the timeframe is wrong

They act the way they do because of complex cultural, economic and political backgrounds which have huge rippling effects i the way individuals act. I think this debate has come full circle but I also think its funny how civil you became after just calling people retards and shit like cmon man

alright cya

we arent all soros funded terrorists lol (none of us are)

😕

alright well cya

good talk I guess

man

these servers

are not good for my mental health

I should become apolitical for a month

and delete reddit

lol

yeah I agree

bye

uhoh

no

lol

why dont you go shoot yourself in ur bunker again

oh so it was argentina then?

lmao

Im sorry adolf

hahaha

Did you find the 5th interstellar up there?

epic

so Im researching leninism and I am having trouble with the idea of democratic centralism. It seems like a measure that makes sense in wartime or crisis but not afterwards, and I think after a revolution minority opinions in party debates should be more cared for. The people should not have to completely fall in line and unite behind an action that they dont support just because it won in a slim vote. It sounds like an authoritarian idea that makes sense only in the situation of the russian civil war. Anybody have thoughts on it? I am pretty uneducated so take that in mind
I get "unity in action" but the soviets didnt need to have that after the war, they could have allowed more democratic discourse

is leftypol even leftist lmao

I see u guys way more often so far

ye

"right wing cucks"

that seems ironic

isnt cuck a right wing thing

lmao

so Im researching leninism and I am having trouble with the idea of democratic centralism. It seems like a measure that makes sense in wartime or crisis but not afterwards, and I think after a revolution minority opinions in party debates should be more cared for. The people should not have to completely fall in line and unite behind an action that they dont support just because it won in a slim vote. It sounds like an authoritarian idea that makes sense only in the situation of the russian civil war. Anybody have thoughts on it? I am pretty uneducated so take that in mind
I get "unity in action" but the soviets didnt need to have that after the war, they could have allowed more democratic discourse

@LaFlame nice argument

real intelligent