no surprise, really

https://i.redd.it/ip1h8v7lxoa31.jpg

"Steven Swinford" I love when actual British names literally sound like someone making up a British name to mock britbongs.

@Omar_The_OMAP (((Judeo-Christian))) 😂

The "slippery slope" was treating women as adults.

The rest of them you don't realize are Jews, yet.

The more you bother looking, the more you actually notice.

Also, how as soon as it became apparent Epstein was gonna be brought up on charges again. They started trying to scrub the fact he was jewish from wikipedia.

To their credit, there were also Jews on twitter and elsewhere acknowledging he was Jewish.

That was refreshing to see.

There's also a ton of historical shit done by Jews which is either rarely mentioned, or only acknowledged with a ridiculously positive spin. and it's a likely contributing factor to why there may be a lot more blood on the horizon soon. Their political, media, and financial monopolies are too busy trying to make them look like perpetually guiltless super victims, normal Jews often don't even realize why the goyim are mad.

Not every group has an absurd degree of control on media and academia.

Most media is operated out of extremely Jewish areas, and Hollywood, well, even Halsey couldn't deflect that observation.

w e w

even if it was the case that the most financially successful people in the US were all white, and that this all came about due to no foul play, rent seeking, or nepotism, it wouldn't be a good reason for people to ignore what the values and agendas are of those very successful people

power is power, whether you agree with how it was achieved of not

And Calvinists are pro-immigration, pro-abortion, and pro-transexualism?

When they're not in Isreal on the first, yes.

on average

they lean further left than the general population on many issues

There was a great video by Sean Last where he actually went over the data, but it's gone from youtube now

Not *that* far.

Basically, he went over the numbers. The general population was more to the right of the political elites, and the jews were further to the left of them, and the jewish elites were *really* far to the left, on average.

The general Jewish population is to the left, but not nearly as hard left as the Jewish mafias.

But as a subset of the elites, the Jews are further left than typical.

Whether they're more open borders *because* they're Jews is pretty irrelevant to the question.

But yes, to an extent, they probably *are.*

Because it's a political gaming tactic. And falls in accordance with certain explicitly stated Jewish values.

hospitality to the stranger, and tikkun olam

basically, they have this concept, a sort of mission, "healing the world"

and it serves as a vehicle to promote all sorts of cuckery

Also, we have to keep in mind, the financial system is heavily Jew driven. And if you're gonna say, "Well, if you want financial success, it helps to be more leftist." What perhaps may factor *into* that?

Insofar as a political gaming tactic, it's a useful method of augmenting relative dissonance. In an almost exclusively white society, Jews will stand out more than in a society with high levels of diversity. Ergo, it helps to facilitate infiltration.

Which is also, heavily Jewish.

Read Culture of Critique.

I don't know as much specifically about Judaism, but many of the biggest earlier promoters of socialism were Jews, as well as often being involved with organizing affiliate entities, unions, etc.

While there's a theory that marxism is basically a backdoor to instituting some Talmudic vision of the world, where the only property owners are Jews, I haven't really investigated that much. It's likely some of the Jewish communists were genuinely atheistic, but also possible that they may have been using it as a graft, sure.

They don't practice it as an official doctrine in *their own* countries, so much.

But they push for it aggressively outside of Israel.

"Give me your tired, your poor" ring a bell?

it's not so much specifically tied to their religion, but certain ideas in their religion provide a set of values to serve as an impetus for instituting certain agendas.

Like, I don't think there's literally a part of the Jewish faith that says, "Infiltrate goy societies, and trick them into raising their boys as girls."

https://www.cfsri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/liberty.jpg

It was a poem written by a Jew, attached to the Statue of Liberty after it was built.

Basically, an attempt at revision of its symbolic function.

It was originally a symbol of comradarie between the US and the French, a symbol of their mutual struggle for liberation. But was later turned into a symbol of unfettered and uncritical immigration.

i'm by no means arguing their would be no supporters of socialism, abortion, or transgenderism without jews, just to be clear

or even that this is something all jews support, they don't

Basically, what's happening isn't largely the consequence of the whole of the population of Jews, but a relatively small number of very influential and highly motivated jews, working in tandem with many non-jewish elites to push certain agendas.

The jewish vector of organization shouldn't be ignored, but it's not a universal condemnation of jews.

(((them))) spreads the meme further, unfortunately

it's punchy

maybe I'm biased, because it was an effective strategy with me, as it was aggressively utilized *by* jews who were skeptical of these mafias

Basically, I once encountered a steam group, with a handful of Jews who were libertarians and ancaps, and largely nationalist. Who were actually willing to acknowledge and discuss how much of an impact Jews had.

At first I just thought they were trolling, but eventually, I got to conversing with them, and realized, "holy crap, they're right"

There are, in fact, Jews who realize this is a kind of self-destructive strategy that some Jews employ, that has the tendency of making them a target across history.

Yes.

And then there was Frame Game. Who went into more detail regarding how their groups operate. Unfortunately, he vanished off the internet about a year ago.

He made probably a few dozen videos, very lengy, often over an hour long. Where he would examine a news article, and explain exactly what organizations were involved, and why they were doing what they did. He actually works as a corporate lawyer, so he understands how the business world operates. He is also heavily into debate, so he could dissect their arguments and framing, to show how they were persuading people.

And of course, he was also Jewish. And understood how their culture worked, to explain it in that context as well.

I'm really sad he's gone. He gave me hope for a peaceful resolution. He even pointed out a huge problem in why it's so hard for Jews to actually side with reform of these activities. They're aggressively punished by other Jews, and non-Jews are shit at actually protecting them. Basically, we can't protect Jewish whisteblowers, so, they often either get intimidated, or disappeared.

And he was willing to address this problem without "hating" his people. He always made a point of that.

Love is important.

Unfortunately, one of the biggest obstacles to explaining the JQ, is that many of the real things Jews have been involved with sound so over the top, that people assume they're lies. lol

It's like when you're trying to explain crime statistics, and people assume you're racist.

I criticize Israel, but when you get right down to it. I'm not opposed to Jews having their own homeland. I just get irritated that they had to built it next to (and on top of) people who they can't get along with.

Frame Game even explained the whole AIPAC thing. Like, it's kind of a meme, and most people who look into it see only a small amount of money being pledged from AIPAC itself, and assume you're just blowing hot air. But that's not what AIPAC's function is. It's basically a *vetting* system, to network candidates with wealthy donors. You don't actually get much of a contribution *from* AIPAC, but from people who *pay attention* to AIPAC's evaluations of candidates, and the grades they issue on their report cards.

I agree people have a right to own land. Yes.

Yeah, that's where survival factors in, at least to an extent.

The funny thing about moral values, is that they tend to be easiest to practice when they don't come at a personal cost.

Like, Free Speech, for instance.

Lots of people talk big about Free Speech, but the instant that ensuring it would disadvantage them sufficiently, they tend to be much less eager.

Culture of Critique actually explores a lot of it. Basically, the theory is it's a set of adaptive behaviors which were useful mostly in the context of their diaspora, but led to a lot of conflict and antagonism with host cultures, resulting in frequent exiles. Ironically, perpetuating the very state which led to the behavior.

Exactly. The thing that would probably defuse that whole situation, is just a recognition of the specific bad actors, and a reasonably sincere attempt to resolve the corruption. But this probably won't happen. The more "anti-semetic" people become, the more fiercely the Jews will tend to band together, because of the heightened sense of danger. Which will further exacerbate the issue.

I actually once promoted an op, inspired by "It's Okay to be White"

"It's Okay to be Jewish"

The reason I believe this is an effective strategy, is because, the Jews generally aren't, and at least *shouldn't* be targeted based on the fact they're Jewish. The mission needs to be clear that criticism should be directed at specific bad actors. And that, insofar as the general Jewish population isn't involved with this, there should be no animosity.

Also, it's effective because it will likely uncover the degree of neuroticism in the whole "shapeshifting" deal, and cause confusion and alarm among the peddlers of hysteria.

Why would it look like it's attacking all Jews? The meme is explicitly "It's Okay to be Jewish"

I use that even when referencing people who I *don't* believe are part of some conspiracy or agenda. Because I think noticing is important. The crypsis is dangerous to facilitate. And I want to apply this consistently, instead of selectively.

The whole "Hello fellow white people" strategy

basically, Jews pretending to not be Jews.

Identifying someone as a Jew shouldn't be an attack. Just an acknowledgement of reality.

They need to learn.

Most who are immediately repulsed are pretty far gone anyway.

Also, I suspect it's a bit of a vent.

Like, it's actually super frustrating to hear normies talk about someone who is inexplicably hostile to whites, or to nationalism, or to christianity, or promoting some variant of poz, and not make the connection that they're also Jewish.

Like, you remember the "Queer Kids Stuff" host?

Some folks on twitter acknowledged to her that she was Jewish, and she got confused and freaked out, she was like, "How did they know?"

And I'm just sitting their like, "How is it that so many people *don't* know?"

Like, admittedly, some Jews actually really hard to spot, but wow. She was practically a walking stereotype.

Most people don't even know what to look for, that it can be looked for, or why it might be useful to know.

It's a reasonably strong pattern. At least insofar as politics and culture are concerned. There are supposedly a ton of Jews who behave in a significantly less memey fashion, but they just don't seem to have as much of a political or cultural presence.

There's also the signal boosting effect of Jewish networking. Like, often they'll know someone who knows someone, and so a lot of the people pushed to the forefront on cultural issues, or even who manage certain media entities, tend to be Jewish. Not that they can't find plenty of goyim to do that stuff, but well, knowing people can get you places.

Noticing the Jewish pattern is important, because it is a factor, no not the only one, and part of solutions is just figuring out what people want, and why.

Because basically, it means that the solution involves establishing a paradigm where Jews don't feel as if they need to do this in order to feel secure in host nations. Well, the *peaceful* solution, at least. Which I certainly hope can be achieved.

That's why I proposed the other strategy.

And the Brackets is a kind of "door in face" tactic, more than anything, when practiced outside circles of people who are already aware.

There just isn't any equivalently punchy method of acknowledging Jews, unfortunately.

And it also serves as a kind of shit test.

Which, unfortunately, tends to select not only for people who tend to not be immediately turned off by controversial statements, but people who are so autistic, that they themselves often have shitty optics among normies.