>the holodomor didn't happe- 😱

He gets punished for it though...

weak tbh

Daily reminder that the designation of "kulak" was entirely arbitrary and expanded to include just about every single category of peasent in order to fullfilll quotas dreamt up by Moscow

porn is bourgeois decadence

it will be abolished under socialism

Winning the support of porn addicts who do nothing but masturbate all day and play videogames is not necessary for the triumph of socialism

t. buttmat porn addict

*buttmad

Wrong. Porn is objectively harmful. It is addictive, it is harmful to one's perception of women, it is harmful to any active relationships that they may have, and is a sympton of lack of self-control, which is necessary for any revolution.

@Trans-10 ton fire spewing dragon yeah dude socialism = hedonism let's start giving 15 year olds cocaine to liberate them XD XD XD

Idgaf about culture I care about cultivating healthy humans for the next stage of human life and banning addictive substances is one way to achieve this. Mao knew it, Stalin knew it, everyone seems to know it besides modern day "leftists".

There's a difference between medical use and recreational use.

cool story bro

Comrade Reddit strikes again! We should increase reddit immigration to this server tbh

@su oi fugg off christianity is the way the truth and the light

Redistribution is necessary read a fucking book.

Also redistribution is socdem communism isn't redistribution it's abolishment of private property good god you amerikkkans are retarded.

>I haven't read it but I know it's bad

t. retard

>dude just don't read anything who cares about factual accuracy when I have muh feelz on my side lmao

:^)

>savage acts by red army

>abolishment of private property is stupid

>communist ideas are just meh

explain how all three notions are not just "muh feelz" in other sentences

a jaded christian socdem

lmao read a book kid social democracy at least in my country was literally formed out of nothing from devout christians

back then we actually gave a shit about the working class instead of more tax cuts to le ebin job creators

canada

pffffttt good luck with that even with Trump as president nato still hasn't collapsed

@Deleted User Ah yes because getting shot for being le evil christian oppressor ala catalonia soviet russia et al is so much fun

No I didn't

Just pointing out that just abandoning canada is stupid as america willl never go for it

>leftypol is only for MLs

ebin

simply ebin

Everyone on 8chan hates christ

*most people on 8chan hate christ

they just have a different form of hating him

at least the commies are honest in where they stand

better than the faux believers you find on /christian/

well I was raised in a baptist church but I go to a mennonite one right now

wtf is a roasite

roastie

I still don't get this r9k speak

so sad

so many wasted lives

Germany bombed civilian targets first

prove it

https://i.imgur.com/lSe0VGC.jpg

Pic related shows Warsaw burning after being saturated with German bomb raids in September 1939 during the Polenfeldzug. I sure am curious what proofs deniers have to offer that would place Allied bombing of civilian targets on a date earlier than this. If they say "British bombing of German Wilhelmshaven on September 4th, 1939", they will lose, because on 1 September 1939, at 04:40, the Luftwaffe bombed the Polish town of Wieluń, destroying 75% of the city and killing close to 1,200 people, most of them civilians.

So, the revisionists will carefully move the goalposts from "first bombing" to "first strategic bombing of a major city". But even here, they lose, because of the bombing of Warsaw:

As the German Army approached Warsaw on 8 September 1939, 140 Junkers Ju-87 Stukas attacked the portions of the city on the east bank of the Vistula River and other bombers bombed the Polish Army positions in the western suburbs. On 13 September Luftwaffe level and dive bombers caused widespread fires. Finally, starting at 0800 on 25 September, Luftwaffe bombers under the command of Major Wolfram Freiherr von Richthofen conducted the largest air raid ever seen by that time, dropping 560 tons of high explosive bombs and 72 tons of incendiary bombs, in coordination with heavy artillery shelling by Army units. The center of Warsaw was badly damaged. Approximately 1,150 sorties were flown by a wide variety of aircraft. By estimates around 20,000 to 25,000 civilians were killed, 40 percent of the buildings in the city were damaged and 10 percent of the buildings destroyed. However, some of the damage was the result of ground artillery fire and not solely caused by aerial bombing—including intense street fighting between German infantry and armor units and Polish infantry and artillery. The September 25 raid was an example of terror bombing, with the aim of breaking Polish morale and forcing a Polish surrender.

Now of course, the revisionists will conveniently further move the goalposts and say "well we were talking about whether Germans deliberately bombed British first or whether British deliberately bombed Germans first, and we can guarantee you it was the British who bombed Germans first!"

The smirking historical revisionist will then proceed to point out the following date: September 4th, 1939. And name you the city: Wilhelmshaven. He might go to say: It was the first RAF Bomber Command raid of World War II, where ten Bristol Blenheims of No. 110 and No. 107 Squadrons attacked units of the German fleet at low altitude. Except...what he will not say, is that said attack ended in the squadron losing half their number without achieving any significantly damaging hits. Would you consider a terrorist blowing himself up in a crowd but managing to kill none except himself a successful terrorist attack worth remembering compared to one where people actually do get killed?

Therefore, the widely accepted view is that Germany successfully bombed British civilians first when a bomber flying over London lost its way and bombed a number of houses instead of factories, killing civilians. In retaliation Britain lead an all out bombing raid on Berlin killing a handful of civilians. Thus, it was Germany who started the bombing of CIVILIANS between itself and Britain, and that's what is considered an atrocity - not any successful or failed attempts to bomb military targets.

So to answer the question, only between Britain and Germany, was Britain the first to intentionally order the bombing of non-military targets in German cities, but the Germans were the first to unintentionally kill British civilians, and intentionally kill allied civilians in their bombing raids in Poland, France, Norway, Holland and Belgium. But it gets a bit more complicated because the first deliberate British attack on a German city itself, rather than ON a military target IN a city, was the attack on Mannheim on 16 December 1940. But by then thousands of British civilians had been already killed by the Luftwaffe in what is known as "the Blitz".

>no arguments

It was unsuccesful...in bombing a MILITARY target

not a civilian one

>like those don't count

except they do

bombing polish and french civvie targets is enough casus belli

see you're typing all this bullshit but none of it is sourced

bruh can you not read I said bombing polish and french civvie targets is enough casus belli for britain to bomb german civvie targerts

whoever starts it first deserves to get hit back

Was Warsaw really on the frontline when it was first bombed on September 1st, 1939? Nope. The troops did not get there till after the 8th, a week later. The Nazis also bombed Wieluri, Frampol, and Kamieniec in Poland killing Polish civilians in September 1939, they bombed 14 cities in France, including Lyons, between May 9 and 10, 1940 and on 14 May 1940 the Luftwaffe bombed Rotterdam, a major city full of civilians, killing over 800 people, destroying the historic city center, which (with the Luftwaffe threatening to terror bomb Utrecht as well) lead to the capitulation of the Dutch, therefore a success when it comes to terror bombing civilian targets for strategic purposes.

you're defending civlian slaughters chad

>the troops did not get there till after the 8th >gee I wonder who's left????? :^)

Where did I say I advocated for the crusades? lmao thi sis what 3 against 1 and you're still strawmannig

I don't advocate for them because they were a fucking failure that didn't even accomplish what they set out to do and also resulted in a lot of intra-christian slaughter

>when you killl your allies you win

basically the crusades summed up

>different denominations

AHAHAHA like what

praising kek?

/christian/ is more /pol/ than anything close to christ

you can literally worship hitler on there and not get banned

hitler was literally an antichrist worse because he pretended to be one

(christian) that is

explain positive christianity @chad defend it if you can

*an antichrist

there are many anticrhists

again

explain positive christianity

surely if he was so pro jesus he wouldn't have felt the need to warp doctrine

to fit his own purposes

boenhoffer saw what hitler was and rightly diagnosed him

Positive Christianity differed from mainstream Christianity in that Positive Christianity:
Rejected the Jewish-written parts of the Bible (including the entire Old Testament)
Claimed "Aryanhood" and non-Jewishness for Christ
Promoted the political objective of national unity, to overcome confessional differences, to eliminate Catholicism, and to unite Protestantism into a single unitary Positive Christian church[10]

wow so christian unbelievable I love hitlerrrr

I mean there's a whole book linked enjoy

https://books.google.ca/books?id=RreXLeUG_AIC&pg=PA13&redir_esc=y&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

Why are Nazis and Commies use the same tired excuses when it comes to things they want to deny? >it's written by the bourgeoisie! is no better than >it was written by a jew!

to one what?

Expected what? You never answered my question.

@Deleted User Is this what you want me to reply to? >The talmund instructs jews to enslave and to oppress the goiym. My response would be (if that is the case) It was written like a billion years ago - my bible tells slaves to obey their masters - do modern christians accept the institution of slavery? No. It is only logical that modern jews would not follow such a reprehensible command as well. Thus the whole scaremongering is pretty stupid. Satisfied? Or do you want to start throwing the super scary jpgs saved from /pol/ at me?

Again with the strawman since when was the institution of slavery 90% of the bible? inb4 joke about nature of sin w/e. The point of the bible is to learn to love the lord your god with all your mind soul and heart and secondly to love your neighbor as yourself all else is addendum.

lmao how are you so bad at videogames like dude it's just buttons just press them lmao

dark souls is so easy lmao who thinks videogames are actually hardcore like dude just press the buttons lmao it's that simple

hitler was the original soyboy

OG SOYBOY

Law and Justice is literally the most based government to ever exist it is actually existing socialism in action

@Sn0w ❄ bourgeois scum :DDDDD