ok prove it

I have provided you with quotes and pointed out a simple causality.

Can you do the same?

because there is no real quasality here and I am not talking about the gold policies

Ok so lets go threw it point by point.

wow that is autistic...

give me stats

Prove to me that there would be a famine elsewhere if there wasn't a famine on Ukraine.

and prove to me that this cause of action couldn't have been avoided with different set of polices

that is a hella goalpost

finally

So you have no data no statistics no nothing?

Well you are making those claims so you have to have something to back it up

but it doesn't seem like you do

ok go on

@Stern No no no... not so easy. Lets start first with which countries participated in the golden blocade. A link to the source plox... sencond we will go to why it had to paid in grain. (Just as a side not "Without industrialized transportation and production systems, famine is more likely to occur" this "is more likely to occur is already moving the goalpost)

@Stern Then you would have to prove that industralization couldn't wait for a year or two.

Well will you adress it or not?

That is not what I asked you for mate.

No I don't but it is in a way outside of the point.

ok give me the point then

@Stern Wow and ?

So you won't adress my questions?

@Stern "
@Stern No no no... not so easy. Lets start first with which countries participated in the golden blocade. A link to the source plox... sencond we will go to why it had to paid in grain. (Just as a side not "Without industrialized transportation and production systems, famine is more likely to occur" this "is more likely to occur is already moving the goalpost)"

Your not gonna reply to that?

because it didn't really matter in this context fam. The problem is that if they could pay in oil for example it wouldn't be an issue?

So why couldn't they pay in oil?

or buy equipement from Germany?

or wait a year ?

@Stern Source?

Gimme the link fam

So you have no sources.

Well then I guess it preety much boils down to: "Ohhh he asked me for a source but I can't back it up because my feelings do not go well with facts"

meeee

suck my dick nigga

https://i.imgflip.com/1evn26.jpg

https://images.tribuneindia.com/cms/gall_content/2016/11/2016_11$largeimg28_Monday_2016_233816172.jpg

based and blackpilled

https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/a6VzbYq_700b.jpg

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/219/208/b4c.jpg

Dat nigga hacked the system.

http://www.quickmeme.com/img/43/43e73d027ac8166dd316da77a60d273082c1f4eaf58ab0ed2748e39e48bb998a.jpg

"This document(https://cdm21047.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/russian/id/3094) from 1926 indeed mentions the gold embargo as detrimental to Soviet-British trade, thus the embargo did exist, at least for some states. On the other hand, it also mentions that in the years its authors investigated (1917 -1925) Britain imported over 6 million pounds of gold and silver from USSR (while exporting about 7 million), so we can safely assume that by 1925 the embargo was nonexistant.

But by 1928 the gold reserve of USSR was at a historical low - while the exact amount was undisclosed, it is estimated that in 1918 it amounted to ~1000 tons of gold, and by 1928 it was down to ~150 tons. Stalin's government took radical steps towards increasing the production, started actively confiscating gold and foreign currency, and cut down on imports (until 1941 Stalin was very reluctant to spend any gold from the reserves at all), but the reserve only started growing again around 1934 - for example in 1932 Soviet mining efforts yielded only 32 tons of gold. (Source: Л.В. Сапоговская, "Золотопромышленность Республики Советов - СССР - РФ: эволюция отрасли в альтернативных системах хозяйствования", "Экономическая история. Ежегодник. 2003" (М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. С. 266-308))"

https://demotywatory.pl/617/On-czeka

https://pics.me.me/hillary-without-makeup-is-actually-george-soros-31304124.png

It didn't fail in France.

Yellow vests do not have a nationalistc background.

There are some nationalist groups that try to incorporate it ( and it is a good strategy tbh ) but the origins of it are not nationalistic so there is no guarantee how it will work out.

ehm @Spookaswa who are you adressing?

Well I would say it is a limited democracy.... but I am not sure if it is a correct way of phrasing it.

I would propose a system where the strength of your vote and the limits of your political career (if you decide to undertake one) are limited by the amount of incentive you have towards benefiting your nation.

For example having kids predisposes you to caring about the future of the nation.... so it gives you a credit.

Participating in the military service gives you another one etc.

That would be the general outline.

I would guess merc is for pacyfication... and he is expandable... so there is that.

Now you get deported and you get deported and you as well.....

Classical liberal + nationalism sounds like Boomer nationalism.

js

well you are now

😉

Doesn't count.

No maga hat no deal.

The problem with journalist selection is that in the modern world every youtuber can be counted as one. So it would be very difficult to vet it. Regardless I would answer yes if 1. it has a sufficiently big calliber of social impact and/or there was money involved.

If the social impact is big enough I would be fine with his loosing job just for not vetting the info.

welp then we agree

well then we don't I guess.

but I would say it depends on the caliber of the issue.

but any issue that is worth a journalist to loose a job is preety much worth of a legal court varrant.

we most likely do disagree on what is counted a "big calliber issue" tho...

Because you are a classic liberal so we look at it from a different perspective.

lol

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/05/09/105196324-RTX5U767.530x298.jpg?v=1526658231

Kim looks well fed

js

https://pics.me.me/you-better-eat-this-shit-before-ieat-you-1140572.png

Now we know why

?ranks

?rank Right

?rank European

?rank Traditionalist

What is "Other Nationalist" supposed to encompass?

@The Big Oof What is "Other Nationalist" supposed to encompass?

Hmmm...

?rank Other Nationalist

based and redpill

?rank Culture Nationalist

?ranks

Oh nos

Hello dr Kleks.

I can identify a boomer just looking at the avi.

I would even say it is my field of expertise.

I totes would... u see I was studying boomers for ages... their behaviour patters... how they act... how they think.

That is totes true.

I have written my doctor thesis on boomers.

ehhh ok ok

I would disagree. Surprised a boomer is able to grasp such a intrinsic and complicated concept.

well yeah it is hard to let a boomer go that easily

but I would say

hmmm