not abolition of property

regulated markets

Oh. So the state will be in charge of what people do with their property and money, and will, at their discretion, change how you behave with it?

regulated with an eye to protecting tradition in a world that leftist are trying to subvert it

@Deleted User cares more about winning a conversation that having an equal footing with other people.

Not just to a minor degree, but as a matter of central planning?

Like they are now

Well, we have central planning, what fascism would introduce is a moral standard to prevent degeneracy and promote traditionalism

lol we dont have central planning?

You guys are living in la la land

Boy I'm confused.

Yes, the social aspect would be the most "oppressive" compared to now

Like I said, I think it's a semantic issue, but to me directing people's behavior morally, and allowing them to do what they want with their property are contradictory views.

yes, you already ahve limits on what you can do, not sure why you cant recognize that

Why pretend otherwise

I love the vaginal moanings of fashies

you cant buy what you want, and do what you want

you're not being serious

So you would describe things like "You're not allowed to sell an exploding 'hoverboard'" as an example of a centrally directed vision for the moral control of the market?

I can see the fumes coming from the bot @Jab

You cant have porn in the library would be an easy example of morals implemented in todays society

there are so few examples

now

no porn section

Its that kind of thing

would be elaborated on

You wouldnt have gay pride parades

Yes thats a good poster of how things used to be understood

with fascism a third way emerged

“Third way”

So entrepreneurship is encouraged, unless you're a gay pride parade organizer, then your business gets scuttled?

lol yes

@Deleted User social liberalism, yes

Sorry for you

No gay pride parade bucks

"muh freedom!"

But when I said 'the government gets to take what it wants when it wants,' you said no.

Uhuhhhhh

Yes, a rule against something is not "whimsy"

you are describing whimsy "when it wants"

So I was tryign to avoid your dumb strawman

You're life is a auto-biography of a strawman

"laws wont have to be decided and then laws wont be predictable and have all the facets of a system, under fascism"

You are morbidly retarded.

Ah. That's the problem. I didn't mean to imply whimsy. I meant to imply unchecked authority.

"they take my gay pride bucks, all of a sudden whenever they want"

no.

If I wanted a lecture I’d go watch a JBP video

Not listen to your vaginal moanings

Look at Russia, for example, they banned gay pride parades.

You fuckers talking down to other people trying to have an equally-footed discussion of ideas are not worth giving any attention.

they passed a law

"laws will be passed in fascism....omfg you liar!"

you're just not being serious

You lost me.

You think fascism means no legistlative body?

@Mercury he’s just attacked a strawman

That’s all

exactly

Because he can’t make arguments

I attacked the strawman I was being assigned with

Im jus trying to help you to understand it

YOu dont want to, you're indoctrinated into muh capitalism

Maybe you're dwelling on the 'unchecked' bit. I meant 'unconstrained'

Not 'unreviewed'

Capitlaism is not necessarily a facet of liberalism.

Then stop using the products of capitalism @Deleted User

Why would there be no constraint, there's no meta political laws? no constitution? come on. You're just not thinking.

Yeah. No limits on power.

Why would there be no limits?

I just told you limits

No that's what I'm asking.

I'm not telling you what fascism is. You're the expert here.

I describe a bunch of limits, for example I described traditioanlism, and you take that to mean nothing

why

You dont know what traditionalism is, thats why

Well, I told you it cant undermind whats best for the nation, and you take that to mean "anything goes"

catching on?

The understanding I have from what you're giving me is basically 'Powerful people can decide to do literally anything.'

He’s not refuting that point

Why do you think that, I literally said nothing like that.

I'm probably just dense.

Nah

Why don't you tell me what the limits would be?

I explained at the beginning, like the USA, "powerful people" decided the constitution

you just cant follow what Im saying

this nigga still going?

holy shit

Yep

@Fulcrum010 Heh it's fascinating stuff.

@Fulcrum010 fascists are autists confirmed

@Mercury
He is a retarded stuff

that's what happens when you allow wi-fi on the mental asylum

@Fulcrum010 Heh I don't talk to Neo-Nazis very often. And he honestly has a chance to really make me understand where he's coming from here, but I think I made him mad. -.-

Once a group of fascist get together and decide on principles and a bounding document like a constitution, why do you think it doesn't matter?
Only liberals can do that?

silly

@Mercury
I've done that before, and i've seen him before

so meh