lol we dont have central planning?

You guys are living in la la land

Boy I'm confused.

Yes, the social aspect would be the most "oppressive" compared to now

Like I said, I think it's a semantic issue, but to me directing people's behavior morally, and allowing them to do what they want with their property are contradictory views.

yes, you already ahve limits on what you can do, not sure why you cant recognize that

Why pretend otherwise

I love the vaginal moanings of fashies

you cant buy what you want, and do what you want

you're not being serious

So you would describe things like "You're not allowed to sell an exploding 'hoverboard'" as an example of a centrally directed vision for the moral control of the market?

I can see the fumes coming from the bot @Jab

You cant have porn in the library would be an easy example of morals implemented in todays society

there are so few examples

now

no porn section

Its that kind of thing

would be elaborated on

You wouldnt have gay pride parades

Yes thats a good poster of how things used to be understood

with fascism a third way emerged

“Third way”

So entrepreneurship is encouraged, unless you're a gay pride parade organizer, then your business gets scuttled?

lol yes

@Deleted User social liberalism, yes

Sorry for you

No gay pride parade bucks

"muh freedom!"

But when I said 'the government gets to take what it wants when it wants,' you said no.

Uhuhhhhh

Yes, a rule against something is not "whimsy"

you are describing whimsy "when it wants"

So I was tryign to avoid your dumb strawman

You're life is a auto-biography of a strawman

"laws wont have to be decided and then laws wont be predictable and have all the facets of a system, under fascism"

You are morbidly retarded.

Ah. That's the problem. I didn't mean to imply whimsy. I meant to imply unchecked authority.

"they take my gay pride bucks, all of a sudden whenever they want"

no.