TOTAL DESTRUCTION

@The Enlightened Shepherd Well there are only three things to do with the weak: oppress, preach to or destroy.

@Maarat Most beer is horsepiss. I prefer hard liquor and wine.

I do absolutely agree that propaganda is extremely important today

@diversity_is_racism Pass the matches and the blow torches.

But here is what identitarians suggest: We will bitch about white genocide until all people agree that's the spirit and start electing white nationalists even in leftist parties

Leftism isn't a wrong idea that needs to be replaced

I mean it is

But source of leftism is what Nietzsche described as ideology of the people of resentiment

And as longas they are prominent, their leftism, which is always egalitarian, will persist

If I were King Louis XVI I would have also allowed my dissenters to sit at my left but, I would have had midgets taped to the backs of the chairs waiting with ice picks.

Even in Israel, the most cohesive nation on earth, they have their own leftists who are making their zionists plan harder

including orthodox Jews, the most useless type of Jew

Well, it's always something.

this is how we crush resistance

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/f0/23/55/f023559cb793aa306b3e58fd0eb913a7.jpg

before losing your head

Ever notice how women just stole men's wear from the enlightened ages? Stocky though I can be, I totes have the bod for breeches and a blazer. Riding boots. Maybe I should make it vogue again even though all the men's fashion experts on the right say NO!! NEVER AGAIN!!

Don't they still steal men's fashion?

Yes, but when we steal them back we're either gay or sexist. Or both.

right fashion experts

spend fortune on pocket squares and three piece suits

pretty much summed up

and those soks that Spener wears

try hard

@ MRB Do I smell the allure of late 18th and early 19th Century fashion on your soul as well old chum? TO THE STABLES!!!
@ The Enlightened Shepherd There is no need to spend a fortune if you know where to look and are handy with a needle.

i like dressing tight

even for a casual walk

but i cant recommend to anyone to spend too much on clothing tbh

on shoes for example

Me either. Granted, too much is relative. However, I agree.

boots always look good on you if you are getting out of Lada Niva

I went functional with my attire about five years ago. Too much redneck shit in my day. lol

@The Enlightened Shepherd affirmative komrad.

@MRB That ain't no crime. I can just be a bit of a dandy. Some nice flanel tends to fit just fine on the handy-outdoors type.

guys dress so crappy that i dont really need much to look better

just put on anything more formal you have and thats it

like a shirt, pullover, a nice coat and thats it

i live in a slavic country so there's plenty of people walking around in tracksuits and not even going for a football match

TRI POLOSKI

@The Enlightened Shepherd I saw Ali G there for a second. LOL

@The Enlightened Shepherd I would think the opposite of the East.

HOW SLAVIC CULTURE CONQUERED FIREFOX

TO BE FAIR

WHAT IS MORE COMFORTABLE

THAN A TRACKSUIT?

I HAVE TO ADMIT

THEY ARE PERFECT FOR LOUNGING

OR BEATING UP THE FALSE

SO

PERFECT FOR DAILY WEAR.

By that standard I dress dapper AF

male bottoms in the old tims actually were as loose and comfortable as track suits

pants were pretty much derived from riding uniforms no ?

@diversity_is_racism that whole "how the Slavic culture defeated firefox" thing went right over my head.

peasants always wore comfy clothing

That's cuz they're peasants.

yes

If it doesn't pinch it doesn't look good.

Women included.

yes though peasant women of old would wear white shirts when working on their daily duties, untying them to loosen them when it becomes to hot

Damn...

and their jiggly boobies would be all around, thats how fertility was so high those days

I am sold.

That's what she said, incidentally.

but peasants were pretty ugly tbh

in those days

what'd you say about my grandma?

only aristocracy was beautiful and fatalistic in love

hey i don't shoot me

Live fast and die forever young one.

my ancestors were all shepherds peasants and rebels

Though the oldest ancestor on my mother's side was some kind of prince methinks

but that was like 700 years ago

I think most families have similar stories. I don't know what's big talking family myths and what's an actual hit on the ancestry.com. But hey, many kingships fell and many regals and nobles really got some tail.

it doesn't matter. you are your ancestors.

i can be pretty much sure until the 18th century as far as my father's family tree goes

because it's a seriously and objectivelly collected, and the area they settled was quite small and compact, easy to assemble

all people known etc

but beyond that everything is shady and unknown

Same here, actually. Past that point into the past, I don't even know if I can trust some random databases associations anymore.

genealogy/dna tests are only good for finding out if you have something unpleasant in there. that's why i got mine. had to put to bed this fucking native american ancestor rumour that i'm sure many of you are familiar with. also wanted to see if i echoed at all (i don't)

im kinda not interested in paying for that since i think chances are very slim that i have foreign blood

obviously, coming from SE Europe DNA would probably show general mix of this area

yeah don't bother unless you have some annoying boomers constantly telling you your grandpa fucked a feather

But up until 20th century this was a very secluded area, where peple would marry into a village next door

@Gil O'Teen 3/4 OF AMERIND ADMIXTURE STORIES AMONG WHITES ARE 100% NONSENSE

LIKE, PEOPLE SAID THIS STUFF TO SEEM COOL IN THE DAY

@Gil O'Teen I've got that. It's annoying AF LOL

THERE IS A LOT OF IT

IGNORE

I don't see why would you be concerned if you were 1/16 Indian ?

well i have proof so i have better than ignoring: mockery and boasting!

Is that a problem ?

Again, same here. We all have that one grandparent who is insistent even though they don't expect to be taken seriously. I knew it was bullshit because I live in Georgia and my grandmother insisted that her ancestors walked the trail of tears. I told her that we're still in Georgia. Maybe the ancestor was one of the soldiers? She would have none of it. From my grandfather, he insisted we had echoes in the blood. His argument was that there was some "stein" or "schwitz" or whatever. His family was Prussian before they moved here. Also, we're Catholic.

@The Enlightened Shepherd only if it begins to lead to decay through regressive averages. We do share 15% of their genome so it might not be so bad.

@-A My grandfather used to tell my mom: there's a nigger in the woodpile somewhere. I didn't assume anything until much later when I figured out he was talking about my dad's side of the family. I doubt he meant African blood, just non-white.

He hated my father BTW

That can lead to some drastic libel.

you mean if your partner also has 1/16 amerindian blood