Yeah sure

Just ask Hitler

Thar was there reason to exist

HonorVirtuistPraemium Such as the glorification of single mothers and interchangeability between Landons and German-looking Jews who changed their religion?

That was Hitler's reason to be in power.

One must differentiate from German propaganda about their own war

And the reality behind it's organiation

What? @-A

Society is far more than the economic.

It was organized under HOPE (again) that Germany would not have to fight France and UK at all

His aim was economic....

To get Lebensraum

Saying "tell that to Diocletian," because it was an issue doesn't mean anything.

@Death Strike's Bat And what do you think Lebensraum was based on?

It was not economic.

It means somehtig .

You're just not erudite enough

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_theory_of_the_state

Then when they had to fight them, they didn't have confidence AT ALL that they would defeat France, all evidence from German OKH points to that fact

You, lad, are not.

Rofk

Rofl

@The Enlightened Shepherd post it then

@Death Strike's Bat Ideology is not always economic. How is this difficult to comprehend?

I OPPOSE THE STATE

You wouldn't even read it if I linked you.

WE NEED ARISTOCRATS

AND CULTURE

AND A THRIVING SENSE OF SELF

@Death Strike's Bat >life is economic

Who let the enlightenment man in here?

WITH SOME GOAL OTHER THAN COMMERCE/POPULARITY

Do you like eating M

THE STATE OPPOSES THIS

Aristocrats coalesce around states.

"L'etat c'est moi."

That is not a state

Ha

That is a person who is the state.

As he is sovereign

Yes. It is the King's Second Body.

Not the state appelaratus

This is widely understood in political theory. Obviously one person is not a government.

That he constructed aorund himself.

loooool

What an argument :^)

Depends on the person

Oh, you think one person will be a government for a state :^)?

Yes it has been done

Much more, a nation, mayhaps?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_France#German_strategy

It has been done.

It has been done, eh?

By who?

Constantine, Diocletian, Augustus

To keep it Roman.

Oh, they became their entire government apparatus?!

Wow!

Yes

lol sure.

Their slaves and people who had to obey.

Oh, so it wasn't them :^)

You are just a contrarian fascist.

You seem to love mixing concepts contradictorily.

A Fascist? Nay, I'm a Traditionalist.

They had all powers.

pfffffft

So did Louis XIV

Traditionalism is itself reactionary

No shit

He made the state.

And? You just said moments ago that he wasn't the state.

Reactionary movements are not traditional

FUCKING LOL

He is the state.

As it's his kingdom

😂

Traditionalism is more of a philosophical than strictly political label

If God is in the sky.

Then he is on the ground

One god with one son and one king.

They are peers.

Middle East during the time of writting of New Testament wasn' the greatest powerhouse of political thought tbh ^^

Read the orations of Constantine.

Catholic conception of power is decadent

Goatfuckers weren't smart enough to come up with this shit.

It's not Catholic.

There is no Catholicism then.

Or really Christianity not pietas.

For most "Christians"

Then.

"Goatfuckers" could be smart

Christianiry adopted info European sacred Kingship

But that's not the point

Whixj the goatfuckers didn't have.

They had davidic Kingship

The point is, Biblical conception of power is essentially the one of self-fulfilling failiure

Teach people that all the suffering in the world is bound to happen and that hey shouldn't resist corruption

Teach them contempt for power

When society naturally collapses - "See, we told you so !"

Christianity taught Western men to embrace humanism, and when West, the pillar of civilizaton collapsed - "There, the end of the World is coming just as we promissed"

Well, no shit