pfffffft

So did Louis XIV

Traditionalism is itself reactionary

No shit

He made the state.

And? You just said moments ago that he wasn't the state.

Reactionary movements are not traditional

FUCKING LOL

He is the state.

As it's his kingdom

😂

Traditionalism is more of a philosophical than strictly political label

If God is in the sky.

Then he is on the ground

One god with one son and one king.

They are peers.

Middle East during the time of writting of New Testament wasn' the greatest powerhouse of political thought tbh ^^

Read the orations of Constantine.

Catholic conception of power is decadent

Goatfuckers weren't smart enough to come up with this shit.

It's not Catholic.

There is no Catholicism then.

Or really Christianity not pietas.

For most "Christians"

Then.

"Goatfuckers" could be smart

Christianiry adopted info European sacred Kingship

But that's not the point

Whixj the goatfuckers didn't have.

They had davidic Kingship

The point is, Biblical conception of power is essentially the one of self-fulfilling failiure

Teach people that all the suffering in the world is bound to happen and that hey shouldn't resist corruption

Teach them contempt for power

When society naturally collapses - "See, we told you so !"

Christianity taught Western men to embrace humanism, and when West, the pillar of civilizaton collapsed - "There, the end of the World is coming just as we promissed"

Well, no shit

@The Enlightened Shepherd Or perhaps the point being offered by more serious theologians is that one should not abandon their leaders just because they are not perfect?

I disagree that Chrstianity taught the embrace of humanism, just Medici fetishists.

Unfortunatelly, most of theologians are essentially wizards, making you see things that there simply aren't

That's the power of theology

Jesus Christ "I came here to separate children from their parents, husbands from their wives" (paraphrazing)