no but it doesn't really mean much for this conversation, since the claim is that biological race exists in humans

85%

@UNITE THE RIGHT you can find the cutoff by looking at the average dna proportion of mixed people vrs whites

that's the thing though,

we are trying to decide who is mixed

The equivalent of subspecies exists within our subspecies, yes.

85%

@UNITE THE RIGHT mixed people exist, you test a bunch for dna proportion

then avg it

Race is a colloquial term that fits within the definition of ecotypes.

Look at castizos

you then create a degree of freedom factor relative to the mixed avg

You can disagree or agree.

I do not care.

i might be 5% non-white i think

Avg 70% white and castizos are basically white

in which you can say that for 1 or 2 df in a differential established relative to white proportion, this is the cutoff point

according to ancestry

templeton specifically says ecotypes do not correspond to races

finding a cutoff point is not hard

the problem is liberals don't understand basic stats

so this "le where is race" meme is propagated

The way they look at race is a meme

statistics should be mandatory to enter any uni program

They literally break it up by continent

uni level stats should be taught in high scool

school*

would weed out the dumbasses from uni too

what are the different races though

like whites, blacks etc

dna variation in genotype cluysters

there is AP statistics

clusters*

Chads, boomers, and degens. @UNITE THE RIGHT

@UNITE THE RIGHT wtf

Im hwite

race is a set of allele frequency distribution

So all of Asia is counted as one and when they find out Arabs are different from chinamen they're like SEE SEE RACE ISN'T REAL

@agag Show me

it's a physical verifiable thing

Others disagree.

I mean @Noxar

Theyre all important

Kids big dum

Only top quality breasts for my child

@Kierketard However, human ecotypes do not correspond to races under either subspecies definition. Even the advocates of the ecotype race concept acknowledge that the same adaptation can arise independently in different parts of the species’ range (Pigliucci & Kaplan, 2003). Hence, ecotypes do not in general correspond to evolutionary lineages, and specifically human ecotypes cannot correspond to evolutionary lineages in humans since the hypothesis of multiple evolutionary lineages within the human species is rejected, as noted earlier. Moreover, variation in environmental factors can induce natural selection that results in local adaptations even in species that are not genetically subdivided at all (Templeton, 2006); that is, the ecotypes are only genetically differentiated at the gene loci under selection and show little to no genetic differentiation over the remainder of the genome. In these cases, the geographic distributions of the local adaptations reflect the geography of environmental factors and not boundaries of overall genetic differentiation. Hence, the ecotype concept in general does not correspond to populations demarcated by sharp boundaries of genetic differentiation that exceed some threshold.

ok

Premium sustainence

'ok'

do you think it should be illegal for races to mix @Vril-Gesellschaft

Another thing is that sub Saharan Africa is actually very genetically diverse

> ok

ok

@UNITE THE RIGHT You're a retard mate

Africa has loads of diversity

Lmao. It's probably healthier.

@LaCraig elaborate?

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Added Cuckold to Pepe#2564***

Based

Elaborated 😎

Africa is literally full of walking chocolate.

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/WebFeat/qualifiers/ecotype.html

Biodiversity atleast in terms of ecology is better for a environment.

His definition is not THE definition.

Therefore it is irrelevant kek

Lmao africa got chocolate milkshake rivers

Why tf they thirsty

How do people in Africa starve when they have so much chocolate?

And they got mf elephants

I can manipulate words as well to contort opinions.

Why they hungry

If you think Europeans and Africans aren't genetically different you are retarded

wed

Probably because some of the chocolate is hairy

wedWe

Weed

why the fuck africans starving when they got white people farming and being beneficial to society right next to them

Just pick off the hairs.

@Vril-Gesellschaft Mersha has a phd from the University of Goettingen and is a part of the Statistical Genetics Section of the Department of Biostatistics at the University of Alabama, and Lisa J Martin has a PhD from the University of Kansas and is a statistical geneticist

Le appeal to authority

i am phd

no, vril was denying they had authority

Ethos

ETHOS

Don't rely on someone else's authority

he was saying they didn't have the right background

O

I like biostatistics.

Oh wait ethos is appeal to creditability

My b

@agag **By the mid‐20th Century, the views of Clausen (1951) and Dobzhansky (1951) appear to be very similar. Dobzhansky, like Clausen, was focused on the evolution of widespread races in the formation of species. Dobzhansky defined races here as ‘Mendelian populations of a species, which differ in the frequencies of one or more genetic variants, gene alleles, or chromosomal structure’ (Dobzhansky, 1937: 138) and noted that ‘most races are ecotypes in the Turesson's sense’ (Dobzhansky, 1937: 147). For Dobzhansky, races were also stages of speciation: ‘the evidence for continuity between races and species is overwhelming’ (Dobzhansky, 1940: 314) and ‘a race becomes more and more of a “concrete entity” as the process goes on; what is essential about races is not their state of being but that of becoming. But when the separation of races is complete, we are dealing with races no longer, for what have emerged are separate species’ (Dobzhansky, 1951: 177). However, Clausen's (1951) views did differ from Dobzhansky's (1951) in that he felt many of the genecological categories beyond ecotype were of importance to understanding the process of speciation. This difference may reflect the fact that Dobzhansky saw speciation as the end of the process, whereas Clausen was concerned about reversibility after speciation through the breakdown of ecological reproductive isolation.**

Genetic diversity is important in nature.

Indeed it is

funny

joke

laugh

by fellow hhh umans

*laugh*

run laugh.exe

@Azrael Is a bomb

😂😂😂

😂😂😂

😂😂😂

human dialog

@agag if they deny the meta analysis of all dna variation data they are a meme

and no those aren't their backgrounds

Okay, letting the retard back in so he will stop messaging me

hover your cursor over their names

@Kierketard much older studies that pre-date Templeton and Lewontin's work, I'll look at this more later on

it says their backgrounds

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> Removed Pepe#2564 from Cuckold

@Vril-Gesellschaft look up their names

they have more extensive profiles elsewhere

Your genetics don't really define your culture, no.

yes they do

fucking civnats I swear to God

you stupid obstacles

@LaCraig the only retard is the one who mutes people for simply questioning

Lol

fear not we will reform you

fuck off nigger enabler @UNITE THE RIGHT

h h holo ca ust i s is rrreal

@agag Predation does not negate value.**We are currently in the third wave of interest in studying stages in the evolution of species (Schluter, 2001; Wu, 2001; Mallet, 2008a, b; Hendry et al., 2009; Nosil et al., 2009; Smadja & Butlin, 2011). This renewal has been brought about by new ideas regarding the role of ecology in speciation (Schluter, 1996, 2009; Rundle et al., 2000; Lexer & Fay, 2005; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Smadja & Butlin, 2011) and the widespread identification of partially reproductively isolated ecotypes and host races within species (Schluter, 2001; Dres & Mallet, 2002; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Egan & Funk, 2009). A recent review by Nosil et al. (2009) laid out the third wave's argument for studying speciation as a process involving stages: ‘Notably, different species concepts can disagree on when speciation starts and when it is complete, while still sharing the characteristic of having stages of divergence’ (Nosil et al., 2009: 145–146). The above quote echoes the views of Dobzhansky (1937) from the second wave: ‘Species is a stage in a process, not a static unit. This difference is important, for it frees the definition of the logical difficulties inherent in any static one’ (Dobzhansky, 1937: 312). **

You said several very low IQ things

It was not for one question

like what?

@Vril-Gesellschaft He must argue whatever I say because of his personal moral beliefs.

If you think that it proves my point even further lol

This is problematic when looking at data and research.

> most americans are part black

never become a judge

most white americans have a small amount of black ancestry

Craig is that u in ur pfp

i can find a source

if you want

That is not true lol

@UNITE THE RIGHT it's the other way around dood

ok look at this source then

most blacks have some white ancestry in America

that's because they got B L E A C H ED in certain periods

Makes sense

The only argument against race is attacking the definition

Goose is rebooting...

there must have been some whites who had children with blacks

it could go either way, majority black or white from then on

ya liberals always use deconstruction

waiting for the source there big guy

ok

New update installed

@LaCraig I've got a question

whats up?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule#Racial_mixtures_of_blacks_and_whites_in_modern_America

Is this valid for <#356271865876185088>?
https://myfox8.com/2018/10/14/looter-in-hurricane-michael-ravaged-florida-shot-killed-after-trying-to-steal-law-enforcement-vehicle-report/amp/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&__twitter_impression=true

https://myfox8.com/2018/10/14/looter-in-hurricane-michael-ravaged-florida-shot-killed-after-trying-to-steal-law-enforcement-vehicle-report/amp/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&__twitter_impression=true

sure

>behave like nigger

>be shot

and?

why is this bad

30% of whites have on average 2.3% black ancestry

Florida man tries stealing cop car in ruined town <:GWmemetownOMEGALUL:380058735214723072>

Gets shot <:GWmemetownOMEGALUL:380058735214723072>

That is not most

Dies <:GWmemetownOMEGALUL:380058735214723072>

I'm so grateful I wasn't hit by the hurricane.

Most would mean more than 50%

@UNITE THE RIGHT proofs

doesn't even matter because one generation later it would double

30% this generation, maybe 40% the next

That is not how that works lol

Its only a violation of discord tos if its anti Jude xD

@UNITE THE RIGHT no it wouldn't?

```
"He yelled at me a little bit and said, 'Oh, I'm looting.' And he opened the door to the police officer's SUV with the lights going. Got in it, shut the door," said Swett, who added that he gathered his family and turned to go inside his house.

"As I’m crossing the doorway, I look back, I saw the officer at the passenger side, I don’t believe the door was open yet," Sweet said. "Then I got about three more feet inside, and I heard the shot."
```

it would dilute

you moron

im not talking about the percentage

@UNITE THE RIGHT Do you Vape?

@Vril-Gesellschaft what im saying is that if im a bit black and ur pure white our children are slightly black

English teacher "what is the greatest word in the english dictionary?"
Me: ...MOIST

`"He yelled at me a little bit and said, 'Oh, I'm looting.'`
Fucking Floridaman

even if it dilutes nobody is pure

i was talking about the proportion of whites

'pure'

some people are pure

I'm pretty sure I have no african dna

Alt-Hype has some good info as to how the colloquial term "race" is useful in various aspects of life.

@Ben Anti Semitism is not permitted on The Right Server

hype went civnat though lol, although he still views the same on race as before

I think he cucked

because he's gay

(literally he's a homosexual)

and the alt right hates fags

so he abandoned them

It doesn't matter if they're 100% pure

>CivNat
>Is a Racialist

H-how?

he is pro civnat trump faggotry now

look it up

Oh boi

Still useful data tho

true

Why can we hate negroids and not Jews @cooldad92

he went the way of baked alaska

went full trumptard

couldn't handle the heat of political change

so settled for faux revolution meme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-sATHRO0jo @Kierketard

??

Lmao

pure

cringe

Oh boi

<@&366007991025139724> who wanna play fortnite

I never watched Baked Alaska

reee

See this is what happens when you lose your server's litmus test you get allot of low quality shitposters... Like myself

Baked Alaska is horrid

he went insane

or something

that video is mk ultra tier creepy tbh

isn't baked alaska a food

Everyone gawked over Drumpf too much

trump is useful in some respects

Fried icecreem

<@&366007991025139724> WE LOVE FORTNITE WE LOVE FORTNITE

*This chat has drifted further from God.*

but it's not enough of a social shift

the ball needs to keep rolling

the civnat obstacles are preventing that

@! Kurayami no anime

Le. Baked Alaska

Ew

god ain't allowed here. I wish it was

**Baked Alaska is a dessert food consisting of ice cream and cake topped with browned meringue.**

people who have usernames that start with an exclamation point deserve to be euthanized

*God

Sounds pretty good.

God is allowed everywhere

@Kierketard that looks good

and God is Everywhere

damn i want some baked alaska now

Baked Alaska is a retard

^

I want Shepherds pie...

I need to make a pavlova

meat pies are disgusting