Message from @UNITE THE RIGHT
Discord ID: 501441450408542218
*laugh*
run laugh.exe
@Azrael Is a bomb
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
human dialog
@agag if they deny the meta analysis of all dna variation data they are a meme
and no those aren't their backgrounds
Okay, letting the retard back in so he will stop messaging me
hover your cursor over their names
@Kierketard much older studies that pre-date Templeton and Lewontin's work, I'll look at this more later on
it says their backgrounds
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> Removed Pepe#2564 from Cuckold
@Vril-Gesellschaft look up their names
they have more extensive profiles elsewhere
Your genetics don't really define your culture, no.
yes they do
fucking civnats I swear to God
you stupid obstacles
Lol
fear not we will reform you
fuck off nigger enabler @UNITE THE RIGHT
h h holo ca ust i s is rrreal
@agag Predation does not negate value.**We are currently in the third wave of interest in studying stages in the evolution of species (Schluter, 2001; Wu, 2001; Mallet, 2008a, b; Hendry et al., 2009; Nosil et al., 2009; Smadja & Butlin, 2011). This renewal has been brought about by new ideas regarding the role of ecology in speciation (Schluter, 1996, 2009; Rundle et al., 2000; Lexer & Fay, 2005; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Smadja & Butlin, 2011) and the widespread identification of partially reproductively isolated ecotypes and host races within species (Schluter, 2001; Dres & Mallet, 2002; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Egan & Funk, 2009). A recent review by Nosil et al. (2009) laid out the third wave's argument for studying speciation as a process involving stages: ‘Notably, different species concepts can disagree on when speciation starts and when it is complete, while still sharing the characteristic of having stages of divergence’ (Nosil et al., 2009: 145–146). The above quote echoes the views of Dobzhansky (1937) from the second wave: ‘Species is a stage in a process, not a static unit. This difference is important, for it frees the definition of the logical difficulties inherent in any static one’ (Dobzhansky, 1937: 312). **
You said several very low IQ things
It was not for one question
like what?
@Vril-Gesellschaft He must argue whatever I say because of his personal moral beliefs.
If you think that it proves my point even further lol
This is problematic when looking at data and research.
> most americans are part black
never become a judge
most white americans have a small amount of black ancestry
Craig is that u in ur pfp
i can find a source
if you want
That is not true lol
@UNITE THE RIGHT it's the other way around dood
ok look at this source then