human dialog

@agag if they deny the meta analysis of all dna variation data they are a meme

and no those aren't their backgrounds

Okay, letting the retard back in so he will stop messaging me

hover your cursor over their names

@Kierketard much older studies that pre-date Templeton and Lewontin's work, I'll look at this more later on

it says their backgrounds

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> Removed Pepe#2564 from Cuckold

@Vril-Gesellschaft look up their names

they have more extensive profiles elsewhere

Your genetics don't really define your culture, no.

yes they do

fucking civnats I swear to God

you stupid obstacles

@LaCraig the only retard is the one who mutes people for simply questioning

Lol

fear not we will reform you

fuck off nigger enabler @UNITE THE RIGHT

h h holo ca ust i s is rrreal

@agag Predation does not negate value.**We are currently in the third wave of interest in studying stages in the evolution of species (Schluter, 2001; Wu, 2001; Mallet, 2008a, b; Hendry et al., 2009; Nosil et al., 2009; Smadja & Butlin, 2011). This renewal has been brought about by new ideas regarding the role of ecology in speciation (Schluter, 1996, 2009; Rundle et al., 2000; Lexer & Fay, 2005; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Smadja & Butlin, 2011) and the widespread identification of partially reproductively isolated ecotypes and host races within species (Schluter, 2001; Dres & Mallet, 2002; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Egan & Funk, 2009). A recent review by Nosil et al. (2009) laid out the third wave's argument for studying speciation as a process involving stages: ‘Notably, different species concepts can disagree on when speciation starts and when it is complete, while still sharing the characteristic of having stages of divergence’ (Nosil et al., 2009: 145–146). The above quote echoes the views of Dobzhansky (1937) from the second wave: ‘Species is a stage in a process, not a static unit. This difference is important, for it frees the definition of the logical difficulties inherent in any static one’ (Dobzhansky, 1937: 312). **

You said several very low IQ things

It was not for one question

like what?

@Vril-Gesellschaft He must argue whatever I say because of his personal moral beliefs.

If you think that it proves my point even further lol

This is problematic when looking at data and research.

> most americans are part black

never become a judge

most white americans have a small amount of black ancestry

Craig is that u in ur pfp

i can find a source

if you want

That is not true lol

@UNITE THE RIGHT it's the other way around dood

ok look at this source then

most blacks have some white ancestry in America

that's because they got B L E A C H ED in certain periods

Makes sense

The only argument against race is attacking the definition

Goose is rebooting...

there must have been some whites who had children with blacks