Why are teachers such trash

@futuremoe i assume you can calculate the years that have passed since 2016

You just need enough know how to make a basic diagram that everyone understands. Formal UML is for leechers pretending to contribute.

@Goz3rr didn’t know your current workplace was your only one.

Aaaanyway School is trash

you should practice those diagrams, so when you finally decide to make something for yourself, it'll be easier to organize

Don't be a UMLet

If you haven't done it yet your capstone/senior project will usually force you to practice it

uml is comfy

AMD Radeon VII Allocation Reports Surface – Just Over 100 Units For The Entire UK, 20 For Spain and France

l m a o

It's Vega all over again

@Goz3rr 100 fucking units

I'm close friends with a dude who works at a local PC store and during its peak they were selling 100+ 1060s every couple days

mind you that's a midrange but like

no one should want to buy one anyways, an rtx 2080 is cheaper and better lmao

wtf who is this card for???

it's an rtx2080 with nuclear reactor power consumption and no rtx

people who legit need 16GB of HBM2

and can't settle for GDDR6

so the one blender sperg

nice

and if the chipset is right and nothing is disabled nvidia way anyone who does computing or machinevision-training etc

r7 will win in pure compute but rtx2080 is the gaymer/ai sperg card

all will pretty much depends on the internal stuff what AMD leaves to that card enabled

if it will beat 2080

not the specs really

but i doubty their tactic is to challenge flagship with their flagship this time

its more to show "we have production ready 7mm fuckers, beat that"

@Tervy how exactly, RTX cards already have the floating point compute unlocked

that was previously locked to tesla/quadro

indeed __if__ the R7 wil lhave FP64 enabled it will give nice contender for RTX,, incase it does not FP16 is there where it beats RTX cards (aka basic content creation tools for now?)

but yeah so far there has been rumors that FP64 _WONT_ be avaible

and some say that it will

one of those things we need probly just to wait a nd see

but indeed if they dont deliver on those marks RTX series will be more obvious buys for same price

unless Mantle API bull something magical out of its ass

NDA drops later today

so we'll see

yeah

are these GPUs mac compatible?

nobody cares about mac

apple has put amd gpus in their iMac Pros

somebody's gonna care

AMD cards will probably be

most current AMD cards work on Mac

so why not future ones?

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/07/android_january_patches/

i wonder when first countries state by law that _any_ device manufacturer sold inside said country needs to provide security updates for 10+ years or something

didn't EU already force 18 months?

note sure, sadly 18 months aint nothing really

18 months ain't shit

>not buying a new phone every 12 months

are you guys poor?

https://9to5mac.com/2019/02/06/adobe-premiere-cc/

Itoddlers BTFO

based polish people

but apparently thats pretty much copy and paste from AMDs own benchmarks

so realworld tests still keep us waiting

Link to article?

Is it possible to determine, when a LUKS encrypted system has been successfully decrypted and booted the last time, if you are unable to decrypt it yourself?

The question in essence is: if you have two encrypted Linux systems installed on two SSDs and you are asked to hand over the decryption keys by the authorities, can you give the password of one of them to the authorities, and plausibly deny to remember the other one because "its an old system that I haven't used in a long time"?

as long as all log files are within encrypted container.. i doubt ?

mm actualy probly depens on system

if Grub2/uefi/whateverbootmanager is a snitch and keeps logs

then yes @Deleted User

but boot managereless login ??should not ?? write logs to anywhere but inside the containers once you have given password

but if you need such deniability, you better of using something else than luks

such scenarios are when the "destroy on password2" bundled with "destroy if copied" step in

later needing quite bit tinkering with the controller board of hdd

this is why you never store anything of negative value on your computers

I am not storing anything that incriminating but wouldn't that be even less plausible to deny?

They can inspect the broken hard drive and figure out

yes but they would not have any proof

only that you had such setup there

And that you deliberately gave password 2 which hindered investigations

Which would bring you right into even more trouble

not really no

you just make the password2 = password2

or 1234

or your wifes name

when they try to passguess they end up destroying it themself

you had nothing to do with it at that point

as always you have right to be silent

and you should use that right

also right to drink,wc,lawyer up fast as possible

you should know this by now :3

everything you say can be and WILL BE used AGAINST you.

I don't understand how that can be less incriminating than partially collaborating and saying that you forgot the old one because you never used it

cause if/when they do get inside

its clear you lied

and your punishment will be more severe

speaking can only make your situation worse

unless the case is clear and you are snitching to lessen your own load

and even then you can confim your guiltyness to other stuff "being there" if you tell them about stuff you saw

what can be additionaly blamed on you too as you were part of it there

you will always lose if you talk