@Priyanka Salam alaikoum

Excuse me, how does a rural revolution increase birth rates?

"KareenaToday at 5:34 PM
Ok, India is bad and never had any civilizations. Europe is great and always has been #1. Happy?"

You know that when @Priyanka finally makes a concession that you completely dominated her.

That's what that friend request is all about. All about psychological domination of an inferior being.

India is gay

@Deleted User Why I'm glad you asked, but isn't it common knowledge that rural women have more children than parasitic city folk? The rural areas are the life force of the nation. Too many property-less urbanite workers running around these days, with their democratic bread-and-circus-brigade fooling themselves into thinking they have freedom without any property to show for. We gotta get ecological, man. Industrialism is a left-wing phenomena.

England shall be like Jason Bourne. That is where it started; this is where it ends.

@Alric the Bretwalda The “concession” is what happens when I realize it’s not worth entertaining someone who is willing to make threats with his actual identity to a point law enforcement shows up

Epic

@Priyanka What does law enforcement have to do with anything? You the type of b*tch to report someone to the FBI after losing an argument in cyberspace? More appeals to authority because you're salty and have no more legs to stand on...or should I say arms? You mudraisers have no humour.

Nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide.

garfields cum can be considered an alternative fuel if you consider my asshole a vehicle

wenrir

🆙 | **WhiteTrashWorkhorse leveled up!**

@Priyanka Spoken like a true status quo leftie. Which is ultimately what you are, beneath the veneer of your little progressive 'firebrand' cheerleading. As for nationalism, there isn't an essence of poo nationalism in you. You're just easily offended is all, like all goofball Indians. Do you have a moustache btw? I bet you have hairy armpits.

no one fucking care sshut up

o man this place gay

Don't you love being the bad boy? The bad boy gets all the women. @Bultra

I only want a cute e-girl with them big circular glasses that has a cute tiktok account

Your aesthetics displeases me. @Bultra

Hideous. And...looks like a boy.

and?

@Deleted User: ''Even if it were true, look what India has become after 3000 years. You had all that time and couldn't progress further than the mud hut?''

@Priyanka: "You're just jealous of me - you all are!" *poo coming out of her mouth and ears*

@Alric the Bretwalda Don't you kind of think industrialization and urbanization is inevitable?

How would you get the land? Conquering? That would require industrialization

Lack of urbanization also decreases efficiency

What are you talking about?

About the rural revolution from before

Are you debating anarcho-primitivism here?

By rural revolution I simply mean there are too many people on the cities today. It's unnatural. Certainly not inevitable. They need to go back to the rural areas.

People can't leave the cities, it's where the business is

That is what I meant by rural revolution. Don't go all Vladimir Lenin on me now.

It's not about the business. We're gonna say night-night to international banks.

As I said, lack of cities decreases efficiency, leaving nations vulnerable to crisis

There's not going to be a 'lack of cities'.

The cities are simply gonna be better controlled, more efficient, etc...

Nothing is controlled at present. It's just automated.

Wdym by better controlled

''Greed will self regulate itself.'' that's the ethos we live under right now.

Too many people living in the cities. Have can you have any embodiment of culture with millions of people jammed into a single space?

Hmmmm

I have explained before. You move people from the cities into the rural areas. Where is the land? The land already exists. If we must reclaim certain lands from big landowners to create new farms, then that is the sacrifice the nation has to make.

There would be enough to feed everyone on this island if we stopped importing all the effin brownskins, and deported the remainder.

But modern agricultur, of which only a small percentage of people work in, already produces several times the food a nation may need. Modern Agriculture is mostly mechanized now , so that more people can get involved in other jobs other than agricilture

Yeah...but..no..but..yeah..but..no...but. There are no more lands to colonise, partner. And this parasitic interdependency of internationalism stinks. There is no other alternative.

Dude, what you need is to read the Unabomber Manifesto and about surrogate activities.

That'll cure your malaise.

What about advancement?

And how will we advance in the current scheme?

This is all about human potential my friend. The racial aristocracy. The peasant-warrior. It'll all be there. Dream big. I shall make your dreams come true.

Your proposal does not curb human greed

It isn't some anti-technological scheme. The back to the soil movement is just one aspect of our progress in having a strong peasantry and protecting our traditions.

How does it not?

We don't worship the money-power. We're not capitalists.

We promote harmony with the individual and collective.

Your scheme merely relocates the place of bureaucracy and corruption, not curb it

How?

If you relocate people to villages, it will spread in the villages

People will still be trying to scam each other and struggle for local control and power

Why?

You have a low opinion of nationalism. Why is that?

How?

Why will people scam each other?

We're building a more collective world order.

One which recognises the character principle ironically enough.

In cities you'll have corporations trying to monopolize markets, if you relocate people to villages, there will be a version of that but for different materials. Relocating them to the rurals doesn't change that people will try to use perhaps unscrupulous tactics to get ahead

Corporations?

Mate the self-employment tax rate is going to be lowering, and the corporate tax rate is gonna be hiked.

Bonus: There'll be no Jews.

People need tools , right? What if someone buys all of the tools and charge them overly high prices for them?

Ban monopolies.

We will do whatever it takes, negro.

joim azov

@Alric the Bretwalda any fascist that wasnt futurist did not understand fascism

ON WHAT BASIS? @Deleted User

''Any fascist who does not conform to my pretty little artistic niche never understood fascism''

What are you trying to do? Force your gay aesthetics on to me, or prey off the vain hope that I'll be ignorant enough to buy your crap.

Also, poetry is gay.

shut u

These articles are really quite gay. Article 10?

https://www.societyforasianart.org/sites/default/files/manifesto_futurista.pdf

the basis that fascism is and was explicitly anti-traditionalist and inspired by the nietszchean philosophy intrinsic to futurism lol

You have futurism today. It's called ISIS.

nice

white ISIS would be sick

Since when is fascism anti-traditionalist?

since forever

''intrinsic to futurism'' as in you mean it's a rip off.

lol

Futurism stole fascist philosophy to incorporate it within its poetry niche.

No. You are.

the futurist manifesto came out in 1909

several years before fascism was developed

"1. We want to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and rashness"

ok